Laplace analysis of simple LC tank (no resistance)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Laplace transforms to analyze voltage and current in a simple LC tank circuit without resistance. The user initially struggles with the correct sign of the voltage across the capacitor when the circuit switches from charging to discharging. The key equations involve the capacitor's current and voltage relationships, leading to a transfer function that should yield an oscillatory response. The resolution involves correcting the sign error in the voltage equations to align with the physical behavior of the circuit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms in circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with LC circuits and their behavior
  • Knowledge of capacitor and inductor voltage-current relationships
  • Ability to interpret circuit diagrams and analyze switching behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of transfer functions for LC circuits
  • Learn about the implications of initial conditions in Laplace analysis
  • Explore the concept of oscillatory response in RLC circuits
  • Review circuit simulation tools for visualizing LC tank behavior
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying circuit theory, and anyone involved in analyzing oscillatory circuits will benefit from this discussion.

jrive
Messages
58
Reaction score
1
I am stumped by an exercise in using Laplace transforms to analyze the voltage and current in simple LC tank. My issue is with the correct sign of the voltage across the capacitor ...let me pose the problem.

A circuit consists of a voltage source V, 2 switches, a cap C and an inductor L. The switch from the source to the cap has been on for a long time (cap is fully charged), while the switch connecting the cap to the inductor is open. Then at time t(0+), the switches toggle, and the voltage source is disconnected and the cap is now connected to the inductor.

v(0-)=V,
il(0-)=0,

The laplace circuit models are:
Cap:
i(t)=Cdv(t)/dt
I(s)=CsV(s)-Cv(0-)
V(s)=I(s)/sC+ v(0-)/S

Ind.
v(t)=Ldi(t)/dt
V(s)=LsI(s)-Li(0-)
I(s)=V(s)/sL+i(0-)/s

So...I can get the answer for the current fairly easily...Since the current into the cap is defined as positive when the switch from the source to the cap is on , then when the current flows from the cap to the inductor at t(0+), it is negative, or -Ic. So,
-Ic=IL

Cv(0-)-CsV(s)=V(s)/sL
solving for V(s),
V(s)=Cv(0-)sL/(s^2LC+1)
invLaplace(V(s))=V cos[t/sqrt(LC)] --> this is fine...

my problem is when I try to solve for the voltage directly...(keep in mind that if I obtain voltage by using this current across the cap or inductor, I do get the correct answer, but not when I try to do it directly), I have a sign problem that I can't figure out...

Since the voltage across the cap = the voltage across the inductor at time t(0+), then
I(s)/sC+v(0-)/s=LsI(s) (i(0-)==0)

this is the problem...the sign is incorrect, and this will lead to a transfer function where I have s^2LC - 1 in the denominator, and not s^2LC + 1 to get an oscillatory response. What am I missing here?

The cap model during the charging phase is as shown in figure in file cap_t(0-).bmp...and for the math to work, I need to change it to the model in figure cap_t(0+).bmp at t(0+). I just can't convince myself as to why...
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
jrive said:
Since the voltage across the cap = the voltage across the inductor at time t(0+), then
I(s)/sC+v(0-)/s=LsI(s) (i(0-)==0)

this is the problem...the sign is incorrect
Hi. You're a bit long-winded, but I think I get the gist of your angst. :wink:

You say the sign is wrong, and I agree that it's wrong...so fix it!

Have you drawn the circuit of a capacitor parallel with an inductor? And marked in the current? And written the voltage across each element in terms of that current direction you drew?

Try it again. :smile:
 
Thanks for the response (and the criticism)...
 
jrive said:
Thanks for the response ...
So you discovered what you'd been doing wrong?
 
Yep...stupid mistake!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K