Laplace Transform of t^1 x e^(3t): Solving the Dilemma

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Laplace transform of the function t^1 x e^(3t). Participants are exploring different approaches and interpretations based on various tables of Laplace transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are comparing two different forms of Laplace transforms: one for t^(n) x f(t) and another for e^(at) x f(t). There is uncertainty about which form to apply and whether they yield different results. Some participants suggest using integration by parts or properties of Laplace transforms to explore the problem further.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their findings and questioning the applicability of different methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of properties of Laplace transforms, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific tables of Laplace transforms and express concerns about the completeness of the information available to them. There is mention of varying interpretations based on different resources.

Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
Im trying to find the laplace transform of t^1 x e^(3t)
but looking it at the table, it looks like there's two different possible solutions for it.
one is for t^(n) x f(t)
and the other is for e^(at) x f(t)
which one do i choose?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you get different answers for both? In this case, the table I'm using would point to the one for e^(at)f(t).
 
i do get two different answers.
doesnt ur table have t^(n) x f(t)? wouldn't that also satisfy it?
 
My table doesn't have that one. What are your answers for each?
 
this is what the table has.
http://users.on.net/~rohanlal/2222.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay, in your case n= 1 so it is just -F(s). What is F(s), the Laplace transform of e3t?

Of course, you could use the basic formula for Laplace transform:
[tex]L(s)= \int_0^\infty t e^{3t}e^{-st}dt[/tex]
using integration by parts.
 
so i choose the other one for t^1 x e^(3t), the one that defender mentioned, because n = 1?
so if i used the one in my previous post, that would that be incorrect?
 
You could also use the other property, namely that

[tex]\displaystyle \mathcal{L}[e^{at}f(t)] = F(s-a),[/tex]​

where [tex]F(s) = \mathcal{L}[f(t)].[/tex] Using this, you only need to get the Laplace transform of [tex]t[/tex], and evaluate it at [tex]s-3[/tex]. You should get the same result with both properties.

Good luck.
 
The point is that all three methods:
a)[tex]\displaystyle \mathcal{L}[e^{at}f(t)] = F(s-a),[/tex]
where F(s) is the Laplace transform of t.

b)[tex]\displaystyle \mathcal{L}[tf(t)]= -F'(s)[/tex]
where F(s) is the Laplace transform of [itex]e^{3t}[/itex].

c)[tex]\displaystyle \mathcal{L}[te^{at}]= \int_0^\infty te^{(-s+3)t}dt[/tex]

will give the same result.

It would be a good exercise to try each method and see.
 
  • #10
for the laplace transform of t^2 x e^(3t) (n is greater than 1)
would http://users.on.net/~rohanlal/2222.jpg be the correct one to use?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
All three ways are correct, but I personally think the exponential property is the quickest, if you already know the Laplace transforms of polynomials.
 
  • #12
can you reread my previous post, i put in the wrong url for the image.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K