Laplace transform with abs value in exponential

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the Laplace transform of the function f(t) = -4e^{-3|t|}(u(t + 3) - u(t-1)), where u(t) is a step function. Participants confirm the need to break the absolute value into two cases, leading to different equations for t > 0 and t < 0. The correct approach involves integrating from 0 to 1 due to the properties of the unilateral Laplace transform. The conversation emphasizes that the integral simplifies significantly within the specified interval. Overall, the participants validate the integration method and confirm the results align with the expected outcomes.
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I have this problem and just need someone to check or correct:
f(t) = -4e^{-3|t|}(u(t + 3) - u(t-1))
where u(t) is step function: u(t) = 1 for t >= 1 and 0 elsewhere;
so, i guess I need to break abs value into 2 cases and have 2 different equations? anyway, here's what I have if someone would be so kind and check my work (at first I applied linearity property and distributed -4e^{-3|t|}:
1. for t > 0:
L[f(t)] = \frac{-4}{s+3} + \frac{4e^{-(s+3)}}{s+3}

2. for t < 0:
L[f(t)] = \frac{-4}{s-3} + \frac{4e^{-(s-3)}}{s-3}

thanks in advance!

ps: i guess one thing I should explain is that by definition of unilateral laplace transform, even though first part of signal starts at -3 we do not consider it, what we are doing is one-sided Laplace transform, so I started integrating from 0- the first part of the expression.

edit: to (hopefully) increase chances that someone looks at this here's the Lapl. trnsf. that are relevant:
L[u(t-k)] = \frac{e^{-sk}}{s}

L[e^{at}f(t)] = F(s-a)
but you probably know this anyway :shy:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
EvLer said:
Hi everyone,
I have this problem and just need someone to check or correct:
f(t) = -4e^{-3|t|}(u(t + 3) - u(t-1))
where u(t) is step function: u(t) = 1 for t >= 1 and 0 elsewhere;
Do you mean u(t)=0, for t<0 and u(t)=1 fot t>0? That's what the standard (Heavyside) step function does.


I think the easiest way would be direct integration. If you look at the expression u(t+3)-u(t-1), you notice it is 1 inside the interval [-3,1] and zero elsewhere. This makes the integral pretty easy to evaluate.
 
ooops, sorry about the typo, u(t) = 1 for t >= 0, you're right.
so I would have to integrate from 0 to 1 (for the one-sided laplace trnsfm)...
thanks!
 
Yeah, and you would get the same answer you already had :)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
870
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K