Laplace transforms for which value of s?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the values of s for which a Laplace transform exists, emphasizing that s must be greater than zero. This condition arises from the need for the exponential factor e^{-st} in the Laplace integral to diminish as t increases. The example of calculating the Laplace transform of a constant, specifically 3, illustrates that it simplifies to 3/s under the appropriate conditions. The conversation also touches on the implications of values of s outside this range, suggesting that the transform may not converge. Understanding these parameters is crucial for applying Laplace transforms effectively in mathematical contexts.
Haku
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
In each case, state the values of s for which the
Laplace transform exists.
Relevant Equations
Laplace transform
I was wondering how you work out what values of s a Laplace transform exists? And what it actually means? The example given in class is an easy one and asks to calculate the Laplace transform of 3, = 3 * Laplace transform of 1 = 3 * 1/s. Showing this via the definition, where does the range of s come out of? I.e. how can I define when the Laplace transform of 3 = 3/s?
And what happens outside that range?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not read the original question so as a general observation, s>0 because factor ##e^{-st}## in Laplace integral should diminish for large t>0.
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...