Laplace transforms for which value of s?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the values of s for which a Laplace transform exists, specifically referencing the example of calculating the Laplace transform of the constant 3. The conclusion drawn is that the Laplace transform of a constant can be expressed as 3/s, valid for s > 0. This is due to the requirement that the exponential factor e^{-st} in the Laplace integral diminishes as t approaches infinity, ensuring convergence. The importance of understanding the range of s is emphasized, particularly in relation to the behavior of the Laplace transform outside this range.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their definitions
  • Familiarity with the concept of convergence in integrals
  • Basic knowledge of exponential functions and their properties
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conditions for convergence of Laplace transforms
  • Explore the implications of the exponential decay factor e^{-st}
  • Learn about the inverse Laplace transform and its applications
  • Investigate the Laplace transform of piecewise functions
USEFUL FOR

Students of engineering and mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations and control theory, will benefit from this discussion on Laplace transforms and their conditions for existence.

Haku
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
In each case, state the values of s for which the
Laplace transform exists.
Relevant Equations
Laplace transform
I was wondering how you work out what values of s a Laplace transform exists? And what it actually means? The example given in class is an easy one and asks to calculate the Laplace transform of 3, = 3 * Laplace transform of 1 = 3 * 1/s. Showing this via the definition, where does the range of s come out of? I.e. how can I define when the Laplace transform of 3 = 3/s?
And what happens outside that range?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not read the original question so as a general observation, s>0 because factor ##e^{-st}## in Laplace integral should diminish for large t>0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K