captain
- 163
- 0
how do you write the laplacian operator in spherical coordinates and cylindrical coordinates from a cartesian basis?
The discussion revolves around the formulation of the Laplacian operator in different coordinate systems, specifically spherical and cylindrical coordinates, starting from a Cartesian basis. Participants are exploring the mathematical expressions and transformations involved in this process.
The discussion includes various attempts to express the Laplacian operator, with some participants questioning the validity of certain transformations and expressions. There is an ongoing exploration of different formulations, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the approaches presented.
Some participants note potential confusion regarding the derivations and the assumptions made in the transformations, indicating a need for further clarification on the underlying principles.
captain said:how do you write the laplacian operator in spherical coordinates and cylindrical coordinates from a cartesian basis?
MathematicalPhysicist said:in general (which is something you learn in vector analysis for physicists):
[tex]\nabla^2=(\frac{h_3h_2}{h_1}\frac{\partial}{\partial u_1}\frac{\partial h_1}{\partial u_1},\frac{h_3h_1}{h_2}\frac{\partial}{\partial u_2}\frac{\partial h_2}{\partial u_2},\frac{h_1h_2}{h_3}\frac{\partial}{\partial u_3}\frac{\partial h_3}{\partial u_3})[/tex] or something like this.
where:
r=xi+yj+zk
and h_i=|dr/du_i|
i.e you take the norm of the vector.