Hi, I have a question regarding the foliation of space-time by slices of constant "time".(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I know that such a foliation is possible given a globally hyperbolic manifold, and one can define a "time function" t, the level sets of which are 3-D Cauchy surfaces which foliate the spacetime. My question is, if we define a "time vector" to this foliation by the requirement that [itex]t^\mu\nabla_\mu t=1[/itex], why is this "time vector" not (in general) orthogonal to the space-like Cauchy surfaces? The lapse function and shift vector measure the amount by which this time vector fails to be orthogonal to the Cauchy surfaces, but it seems to me that due to that requirement above, the vector should always be orthogonal shouldn't it?

My logic is such: since t is a scalar function, the covariant derivative of it is nothing other than its (one form) gradient, and the (vector) gradient of a function is always orthogonal to the level sets of the function is it not?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Lapse function and spacetime splicing

Loading...

Similar Threads for Lapse function spacetime |
---|

B Is Spacetime a Discrete Lattice? |

I Boundary conditions in spacetime |

I Origin of deformation energy in curved spacetime? |

I Spacetime is homogeneous and isotropic |

B If gravity is an effect of curved spacetime, why gravitons? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**