Latex Command Window now available

  • Context: LaTeX 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latex Window
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the introduction of a LaTeX command window feature on Physics Forums, focusing on its performance, usability, and potential issues. Participants share their experiences, suggestions, and challenges related to the new feature, including comparisons to existing tools like Microsoft Word's equation editor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express excitement about the new LaTeX feature, noting its ease of use and integration.
  • Concerns are raised about performance issues, such as the inability to collapse categories in the command window and the presence of placeholder text in 'Common Snippets'.
  • Participants discuss the similarity of the LaTeX command window to Microsoft Word's equation editor, with questions about their relationship.
  • Some members mention that certain LaTeX commands may not work as expected, particularly formatting commands within math regions.
  • There is a discussion about the need for a LaTeX preview feature, with some participants suggesting that it would enhance usability while others express concerns about bandwidth usage.
  • One participant proposes additional features, such as support for SVG and interactive visualizations, to further enhance the forum's capabilities.
  • Several members express gratitude towards the developers for their work on the LaTeX feature.
  • There are ongoing discussions about fixing the LaTeX preview, with some members indicating they are working on solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of the LaTeX feature, but there are multiple competing views regarding its performance, the necessity of a preview function, and the potential impact on bandwidth. The discussion remains unresolved on several technical aspects and feature requests.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that certain LaTeX commands may be missing or not functioning correctly, and there are unresolved questions about the implementation of the preview feature and its impact on forum performance.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to forum members who utilize LaTeX for mathematical expressions, developers working on forum features, and users interested in enhancing their experience with LaTeX in online environments.

  • #31
On a related note,
I found this little "Google gadget" www.google.com/ig/directory?source=gapi&num=24&url=http://www.sitmo.com/gg/latex/latex.xml
which appears to interact with a website to interactively regenerate rendered-LaTeX as you type.

To use it without "adding it to your website [or to your iGoogle homepage]", go here: http://www.sitmo.com/latex/

It doesn't have as many symbols as -Job-'s great LaTeX Command Window... but the [probably server-intensive] interactive LaTeX rendering is cool.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
This is \tau oo \gamma oo\delta!

Thanks a lot, X\rho oo\tau!


P.S. -Job-, the tex code for omicron is just o; \o displays phi.
 
  • #33
Cool, nice Job!

1 < \aleph_0
 
  • #34
Greg Bernhardt said:
Using Latex on PF has now never been easier! Thanks to the hard work of member https://www.physicsforums.com/member.php?u=40201". For the meantime I am interested in any performance issues you may have related to the feature.

At this moment there is no Sigma icon.
What happened?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #35
\frac{Thankyou}{Job}=)
 
  • #36
sszabo said:
At this moment there is no Sigma icon.
What happened?
It's there. It's just not available in every forum, apparently. (Such as this one.)
 
  • #37
\frac{1} {\lambda _1} - \frac {\pi} {\lambda _{x-1_1}}

\sigma
 
Last edited:
  • #38
<br /> S(\widehat \alpha, \widehat \beta_\text{R}) = \min_{(a, b) \in R^{p+1}} \sum_{i=1}^n \psi \left(\frac{\text{R}(y_i-(a+b \mathbf{x}_i))}{n+1}\right)(y_i - (a+b \mathbf{x}_i)) <br />

<br /> \sqrt n \left( \widehat \beta_\text{R} - \beta_0\left) \xrightarrow{\mathcal{D}} n_p \left(\mathbf 0, \Xi^{-1}\right)<br />
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K