LaTeX Latex Tests: Solving for Phi(a, theta) and Phi(b, theta)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latex Theta
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the correct formatting of LaTeX equations for the functions Phi(a, theta) and Phi(b, theta). The user encountered an issue where the first line did not render as expected, leading to confusion about the LaTeX syntax. It was clarified that the first argument after the {array} environment is interpreted as a column definition, which affects how the equations are displayed. The solution provided emphasizes the importance of understanding LaTeX's array environment for proper equation formatting.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with LaTeX syntax and environments
  • Understanding of mathematical notation in LaTeX
  • Knowledge of the array environment in LaTeX
  • Basic concepts of series and polynomial functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research LaTeX array environment usage and best practices
  • Learn about LaTeX formatting for mathematical functions
  • Explore advanced LaTeX features for rendering complex equations
  • Study the implications of column definitions in LaTeX arrays
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and anyone involved in typesetting complex equations using LaTeX, particularly those needing to format series and polynomial functions accurately.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,931
Reaction score
281
I haven't found a thread for latex tests, but I'm sure there's at least one of them. So feel free to move this post.
##\begin{array} \Phi (a, \theta ) = \sum _{l=0}^ \infty [A_l a^l + B_l a^{-(l+1)}] P_l (\cos \theta ) = V_a \\ \Phi (b, \theta ) = \sum _{l=0}^ \infty [A_l b^l + B_l b^{-(l+1)}] P_l (\cos \theta ) =V_b \end{array}##
I don't understand why the first lines does not read "Phi(a, theta)". I wrote \Phi (a, \theta ).
Anyone has an idea? It works for the second line. :bugeye:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps first argument after {array} is always treated as a column definition? Not that \Phi would made any sense in this context...

\begin{array}{ll} \Phi (a, \theta ) = \sum _{l=0}^ \infty [A_l a^l + B_l a^{-(l+1)}] P_l (\cos \theta ) = V_a \\ \Phi (b, \theta ) = \sum _{l=0}^ \infty [A_l b^l + B_l b^{-(l+1)}] P_l (\cos \theta ) =V_b \end{array}
 
I see. Thanks a lot, I was not aware of this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K