What is with this projectile simulation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the projectile simulation from PhET, specifically its behavior when air resistance is included. Users noted that increasing the mass of the projectile results in greater range and maximum height, which contradicts typical physics principles where mass should have minimal impact on trajectory. The confusion arises from the simulation's calculations regarding air resistance, which is influenced by the object's surface area and mass. The altitude variable in the simulation is also questioned, indicating a need for clarity on its role in projectile motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of air resistance in physics
  • Knowledge of mass, volume, and their relationship in physics
  • Basic grasp of simulation tools like PhET
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of air resistance and its mathematical modeling
  • Explore the PhET simulation features and settings for projectile motion
  • Study the effects of mass on projectile motion in different environments
  • Learn about the role of altitude in projectile trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those working on projectile motion projects, as well as anyone interested in understanding the effects of air resistance on trajectories.

sohjau
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to do a project based around this simulation (https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/projectile-motion). I was playing around with it and am confused with how it even works. It seems to work fine with the exclusion of air resistance, but it seems off with it included. When air resistance is included and mass is increased, the projectiles's range and maximum height is increased as well. Why does this simulation do that? Also, what is the altitude variable for?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



First of all, I want to note that in my course, I have neither learned nor will learn a single thing about air resistance. All of my knowledge about it is from a quick search on the internet. Mass should have practically no effect on an object's trajectory unless it is very great because it would pull Earth towards it. This simulation demonstrates that more mass would increase an object's range. Honestly, I have no idea what calculations it is making to determine the trajectory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Air resistance is proportional to area and mass to volume. For two objects of the same shape and density, therefore, the larger one will be held back less.

Also, consider a solid sphere and a hollow sphere of the same size The air resistance will be the same force for both, but will have less effect on the heavier, solid sphere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K