Law of Conservation of Energy Problem (kicking a soccer ball)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to the Law of Conservation of Energy, specifically in the context of a soccer ball being kicked. Participants are exploring the relationship between kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy while considering the effects of angles in projectile motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss equating kinetic energy to gravitational potential energy to find height and speed. There are questions about the relevance of the angle in the calculations and whether to consider the x or y components of motion. Some participants express uncertainty about their results and the implications of rounding in their answers.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of considering angles and the kinetic energy at the highest point of the trajectory. There is an acknowledgment of the need to check calculations and assumptions, particularly regarding the components of motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available. The initial speed is given to two significant figures, which has led to discussions about rounding and its implications for the results.

orangegalaxies
Messages
50
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
A soccer player kicks the ball in a parabolic arc to the opposite goal. The ball leaves the player’s foot at a speed of 27m/s, making an angle of 20 degrees above the horizontal. The mass of the ball is 0.43kg.

a. Determine the maximum height of the ball’s trajectory.
b. Determine the speed of the ball 3.5 m above the ground.
Relevant Equations
Ek = 1/2(m)v^2
Eg = mgh
a) So far, I have equated Ek to Eg to solve for h. 1/2(m)(27)^2 = m(9.8)h. I haven't taken the angle into consideration. I'm not sure if I have to use the x or y component. I got my answer to be 37m but again I don't believe this is correct.

b) I did Ek = Eg + Ek. 1/2(m)(27)^2 = m(9.8)(3.5) + 1/2(m)(v^2). I got v = 26m/s but I don't know if this is the right way to do it since I didn't use the angle again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
orangegalaxies said:
a) So far, I have equated Ek to Eg to solve for h. 1/2(m)(27)^2 = m(9.8)h. I haven't taken the angle into consideration. I'm not sure if I have to use the x or y component. I got my answer to be 37m but again I don't believe this is correct.

b) I did Ek = Eg + Ek. 1/2(m)(27)^2 = m(9.8)(3.5) + 1/2(m)(v^2). I got v = 26m/s but I don't know if this is the right way to do it since I didn't use the angle again.
For a) don't you think the angle is important?

For b) you could check your answer using components if you're really not sure.
 
PeroK said:
For a) don't you think the angle is important?
E.g., what if the angle were zero?
 
for b) your approach and equation is correct(I haven't checked your exact arithmetic though). Since we are interested in the speed of the ball (magnitude of velocity) we can just use conservation of energy.

for a) you say that ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2=mgh## however this equation is missing something. At the highest point of the trajectory, doesn't the ball still have some kinetic energy? How much is this kinetic energy at the highest point ? If you answer correctly you ll see why the angle matters.
 
orangegalaxies said:
I got v = 26m/s
Since you are only given the initial speed to two sig figs, you are right to round it to 26, but it's a bit unsatisfactory because that makes it look as though the loss of speed is 1m/s, whereas it is about 1.3m/s. Had I set the question I would have said the initial speed was 27.0m/s.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K