Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy Exercise

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two hanging masses connected by a thread over a frictionless pulley, exploring the application of the Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy to determine the velocity of one mass as it descends from a height.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the conservation of energy principles, calculating initial and final kinetic and potential energies. Some participants question the efficiency of the method used and whether alternative approaches could yield quicker results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants engaging in clarifying the approach taken and acknowledging the validity of the conservation of energy equation. There is no explicit consensus on the method's efficiency, but a general agreement on the principles involved is noted.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the problem under the constraints of a homework exercise, which may limit the exploration of alternative methods or deeper theoretical insights.

Kernul
Messages
211
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


A mass ##m_1 = 5.0 kg## is hanging from the end of a thread, of negligible mass, that slides on a pulley, of negligible mass too and without friction. At the other end of the thread, at the same height of ##m_1##, there is another hanging mass ##m_2 = 3.5 kg##. Using the Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy, determine the velocity of ##m_1## when it goes down, starting still, of a height of ##2.5 m##.

Homework Equations


##E = K + U##
##K_f + U_f = K_0 + U_0 \Rightarrow E = const##

The Attempt at a Solution


So, since we have two masses that move at the same time but have different masses, we can start writing these:
##K_0 = \frac{1}{2} * m_1 * v_0^2 + \frac{1}{2} * m_2 * v_0^2##
But since we know it starts still, ##v_0 = 0## and so ##K_0 = 0##.
##U_0 = 0## because it hasn't moved yet.
##K_f = \frac{1}{2} * m_1 * v_f^2 + \frac{1}{2} * m_2 * v_f^2##
with ##v_f## being the velocity we are searching for.
##U_f = m_2 * g * h - m_1 * g * h##
So, using the second relevant equation we have:
##K_f = - U_f##
##\frac{1}{2} * m_1 * v_f^2 + \frac{1}{2} * m_2 * v_f^2 = m_1 * g * h - m_2 * g * h##
##\frac{v_f^2}{2}(m_1 + m_2) = g * h(m_1 - m_2)##
##v_f =\sqrt{ \frac{2 * g * h(m_1 - m_2)}{(m_1 + m_2)}} = 3 \frac{m}{s}##
Is this method I used to find the velocity with the law good? Or I could have done better and faster?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Physics news on Phys.org
This is about it, can't do much better than ##\Delta K + \Delta U = 0## :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kernul
Okay! Thank you for replying! :D
 
You're welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K