Laws of Logarithms: Definition & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jouster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights confusion regarding a logarithmic problem presented in a textbook, suggesting it may contain errors. Participants express skepticism about the clarity of the question and question its validity, with some suggesting it resembles a poorly generated math problem. A key point raised is the need for additional equations to solve for the variables involved, as the single equation provided is insufficient. The logarithmic property log ab = log a + log b is mentioned as a potential approach, but the lack of necessary information hampers progress. Overall, the consensus is that the problem is overly complex and likely flawed.
Jouster
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
How do you solve this problem? Do you use substitution or another method? The two equations don't seem to have any connection to each other
Relevant Equations
Logarithmic simultaneous equation questions
1670315231570.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There must be something missing. As stated the question makes little sense.
 
PeroK said:
There must be something missing. As stated the question makes little sense.
This is what it says in the textbook, maybe it's a mistake in the textbook?
 
Jouster said:
This is what it says in the textbook, maybe it's a mistake in the textbook?
Why worry? Move on.
 
  • Like
Likes Office_Shredder and Jouster
This looks like someone tried to get gpt-3 to make a math question. I agree you should skip it
 
Jouster said:
This is what it says in the textbook, maybe it's a mistake in the textbook?
Can you take a picture that shows more. May be this is not the whole problem.
 
I believe what they are asking.

Im on my mobile, so sorry for non latek.

Recall Log ab = log a + log b (this is true for any appropriate base, please fill in the restrictions on the base).Without giving out the answer, for (a): we want to break up the log expression so that we only only get log of p base a by itself on the left hand side of the equation. Use the above hint.
 
You can't really solve for \log_a p and \log_a q if you have only one equation linking the two: \log_a (pq^2) = 20. You need a second equation, and that the question does not provide.
 
Too many variables, this is nonsense. We could do some algebraic manipulation, but it reveals nothing.
 
Back
Top