Lead-Lag Compensator: Band-Pass Filter

  • Thread starter Thread starter CognitiveNet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compensator Filter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the characteristics and capabilities of lead-lag compensators in control systems, particularly whether they can function as band-pass filters. Participants explore the implications of using lead-lag compensators in various circuit designs, including their energy requirements and frequency response.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a lead-lag compensator primarily acts as a low-pass filter and cannot amplify high frequencies due to energy constraints.
  • Others challenge this view, suggesting that lead-lag compensators can achieve different static gains based on the frequencies of their zeros and poles, potentially allowing for band-pass filter behavior.
  • A participant describes a specific configuration of a lead-lag compensator with defined zero and pole locations that could produce a boost in a certain frequency range, resembling a band-pass filter.
  • There is a discussion about the energy requirements for achieving high gains in lead-lag systems, with some participants questioning whether high energy is necessary for effective operation.
  • One participant proposes a method to create a high-pass filter using a lead compensator configuration, indicating that stacking multiple systems could yield desired filtering characteristics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the capabilities of lead-lag compensators, with no consensus reached on whether they can effectively function as band-pass filters. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of energy requirements and the specific configurations that may achieve desired filtering effects.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific assumptions about the configurations of lead-lag compensators and their frequency responses, which may not be universally applicable. The discussion includes various theoretical perspectives that have not been conclusively validated.

CognitiveNet
Messages
50
Reaction score
1
My professor in Feedback Control Systems told me that a lead-lag compensator is basically a low pass filter and that you can't amplify high frequencies because it requires a lot of energy. Thus, you can't design a PID/lead-lag compensated transfer function which acts like a bandpass filter. Is this correct?

Based on this assumption, I've come up with a theory: In my laboratory, I've built an infrared transmitter and receiver with an RLC as its bandpass filter. The receiver isn't working and no other engineers have been able to make it work. So according to what my professor told me, is this because the power supplied isn't sufficient? (If the voltage was any higher, the op-amps would burn up.)

The circuit is shown in the website bellow;

http://howcircuits.com/active-ir-motion-detector.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------
I recently discovered something interesting that might support what my professor stated:

"If you attempt to set ωCO1 to a higher frequency than ωCO2, the band-pass filter will block all frequencies, and no signal will get through."

http://www.play-hookey.com/ac_theory/band_pass_filters.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Another proof that he is right:

The lead compensator offers PD control. This causes it to speed up the response of a system.
With a lead compensator high frequencies are amplified.

The PI controller reduces high-frequency
noise. As such, it can be used as a low-pass filter

The lead-lag compensator combines the lead and the lag compensator.

http://aerostudents.com/files/automaticFlightControl/adjustingSystemProperties.pdf

So from this I assume it is just a compensated low-pass filter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
My professor in Feedback Control Systems told me that a lead-lag compensator is basically a low pass filter and that you can't amplify high frequencies because it requires a lot of energy.

that doesn't sound quite right.

They have transfer function of form ## \frac {T1s +1 }{T2s+1} ##
so can have ac gain depending on ratio of lead & lag times.

The Bode plot shows how they'll respond to a frequency sweep.

Here's an article on them:
http://www.library.cmu.edu/ctms/ctms/extras/leadlag.htm

And here's a powerpoint show that has some nice graphics.
It'll open with Microsoft's free Powerpoint viewer or OpenOffice.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...w5WeCA&usg=AFQjCNGrLxwH3bEqljE0CW2RjzOBQwuHSg

hope this helps. (I'm no expert)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CognitiveNet said:
My professor in Feedback Control Systems told me that a lead-lag compensator is basically a low pass filter and that you can't amplify high frequencies because it requires a lot of energy. Thus, you can't design a PID/lead-lag compensated transfer function which acts like a bandpass filter. Is this correct?

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Lead-leg compensators have different frequencies for the zero and the pole. Based on the difference of the two frequencies we get different static gains below the lower frequency and above the higher frequency.

For example, a widely used PI compensator has a pole at the origin and a zero at a non-zero frequency. A lead-lag compensator cannot achieve zero steady-state error as it by definition has non zero pole location.

Also, consider a lead-leg with zeros at 1 and 100000 radians and poles at 100 and 1000 radians. You will get a boost between the two zeros and attenuation elsewhere, which is pretty much a bandpass filter.

The P, PI, PD, PID, lead and lag complement each other (some are special cases of other ones).
 
SunnyBoyNY said:
Lead-leg compensators have different frequencies for the zero and the pole. Based on the difference of the two frequencies we get different static gains below the lower frequency and above the higher frequency.

For example, a widely used PI compensator has a pole at the origin and a zero at a non-zero frequency. A lead-lag compensator cannot achieve zero steady-state error as it by definition has non zero pole location.

Also, consider a lead-leg with zeros at 1 and 100000 radians and poles at 100 and 1000 radians. You will get a boost between the two zeros and attenuation elsewhere, which is pretty much a bandpass filter.

The P, PI, PD, PID, lead and lag complement each other (some are special cases of other ones).

So you are assuming that a high pass filter can be made with a lead-lag system?
What about the energy requirements, is it very high?
 
CognitiveNet said:
So you are assuming that a high pass filter can be made with a lead-lag system?
What about the energy requirements, is it very high?

How about a lead compensator that has a zero at -1, a pole at -10 rad, and Kp = 0.1? (i like to use the Kp*(1+s/wz)/(1+s/wp) formula as it gives negative pole locations -> stable systems). Though any formula will work just fine.

Now stack five of these systems together. The resulting system is a HPF with -100 dB attenuation at 1 rad and no attenuation at 10 rads (disregarding the curving effect). It's a high-pass filter.

Regarding the energy inquiry, I do not really know the answer to that. Perhaps your teacher meant that to get high gains, one would need a physical system capable of producing high voltages/currents?
 
So you are assuming that a high pass filter can be made with a lead-lag system?
What about the energy requirements, is it very high?


connect a resistor and capacitor in parallel
Place them as Zfeedback around an inverting op-amp

Connect another resistor and capacitor in parallel
place them as Zinput into same inverting opamp

and you have built a lead-lag element.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K