Learning Math with Limited Visual Tools When Calculus is Required

Click For Summary
Struggles with understanding differential calculus of several variables are highlighted, particularly due to a lack of visual aids from the instructor and an unsatisfactory textbook. The importance of drawing 3D graphs is emphasized as a necessary skill for the course, despite the instructor's teaching style focusing on memorization rather than visualization. Suggestions include seeking additional study materials, using graphing calculators with 3D capabilities, and practicing problems to enhance understanding. The discussion also touches on the disconnect between enjoying math-related subjects and disliking math itself, suggesting that applying math in practical contexts, like physics, may enhance appreciation and comprehension. Overall, the conversation stresses the need for visual learning tools and active engagement with the material to improve understanding and interest in calculus.
bubbles
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I'm currently taking calculus ("differential calculus of several variables") and I really dislike math (even though I used to like math), but it's required for my major (comp sci). My teacher can't draw and does not show us graphics of 3-D graphs and functions, so I have a hard time 'seeing' the math. The textbook I'm using isn't really good (not as helpful as the textbook I used for single variable calculus). Do you have suggestions to help me learn math and make it more interesting? Are there any helpful visual tools online? Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bubbles,
If your teacher can not draw, you still must learn to draw fittingly for your Calculus course. Drawing for 3D several variables (three of them) is a necessary part of your course. Your course may or may not be interesting, but it will have some components which you need for your major field - you don't know which you need until later in whatever jobs you do. At least, you need to develop skills in Calculus as a tool. Your book should have a few applied problems to help make the course more interesting; otherwise, you probably have a poor book.

You might be able to find a graphing calculator with some 3D capabilities, but you should not need this kind of technology. None of the rest of us ever needed such technology when we studied multivariable Calculus; WE LEARNED TO DRAW. ...but in case you find some good 3D program, I hope you use it well and enjoy it.

Could you ASK your teacher to draw some 3D representations for clarity of presentation? Seriously, when I was a student, 3D cartesian graph drawing was both part of instruction ON A CHALK BOARD, and part of study & practice exercises (on paper).
 
I don't have a problem drawing the graphs, but I have problems visualizing derivatives in 3-D since my instructor doesn't draw them; he just has us memorize equations and solve problems. I guess the textbook I'm using (stewart, 5e) isn't that bad since it seems to be pretty popular, but it doesn't explain things as clearly and as detailed as the textbook I used for single variable calculus (larson, 8e), and I actually liked my previous calculus course. I think what I need is some studying materials (in addition to the book). Do you think that it's easier to memorize formulas by just reading them over and over or should I do practice problems? Unlike in other classes, I just don't see why or how the formulas make sense since the instructor doesn't explain why we use those formulas, so memorizing them is a bit difficult.
 
use a different book.
 
Id get maple, derive or a cheap graphing calculator, maybe this will help you see the math better.
 
Ya. I personally use maple 11 when I need REAL detail, but I also have a really cool graphing calculator with more functions than I can name in a day. 3D graphing is one of them. A TI Voyage 200 is a great calculator for 3D graphing mainly because it has numerous uptions for the graph, and it also has a bigger screen.
 
Thanks for the advice. I am going to do more practice problems (both inside and outside the textbook). I still can't visualize partial derivatives and interpret them though I know how to take the derivatives, but I just learned them, so that might take some time to understand. I will probably have to do some outside reading (recommendations?) to get a better grasp of the material since I don't really like the textbook.

It's strange that I like math-related subjects but not the math itself. I've always been able to do math but I never really liked it until I see it being applied in physics. Is it possible to do well in math-related subjects if I don't like math (but also don't dislike it)?
 
bubbles said:
...clipped out...
It's strange that I like math-related subjects but not the math itself. I've always been able to do math but I never really liked it until I see it being applied in physics. Is it possible to do well in math-related subjects if I don't like math (but also don't dislike it)?

That is not strange. STUDYING the Mathematics can be more difficult than learning to use Mathematics as a tool.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K