Courses Learning Parallel Computation as a particle physicist

AI Thread Summary
Investing in a course in Parallel Computation is highly recommended for those pursuing a Master's Degree in Nuclear and Particle Physics. While some may argue that only computational physicists need this knowledge, the reality is that most physicists utilize computers extensively in their work. Parallel computation is a crucial skill that enhances problem-solving capabilities in various physics applications. However, the decision to take the course should consider individual coding proficiency; for those less inclined towards coding, it may not be beneficial. Conversely, for those with coding skills, focusing on programming GPUs or FPGAs could be more advantageous. Ultimately, the choice depends on one's specific career path and the opportunity costs associated with the time invested in learning parallel computation.
orochi
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I am starting my Master's Degree in Nuclear and Particle Physics, should i invest in taking a course in Parallel Computation? I know the role that Parallel Computation has in particle physics, but is there any use in a particle physicst learning about parallel computation, or could it be considered a waste of time since only physicists specialized in computational physics need to know about parallel computation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say yes, you should take the course. Virtually all practicing physicists use computers extensively, not just "physicists specialized in computational physics". Parallel computation is a very important tool to have in your toolbox.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and orochi
I don’t think it is that clear cut. If you are not a coder type, it is probably not a good idea. If you are a coder type, it might be better to learn to program gpu’s or fpga’s. Or parallel programming might be exactly what you need. It depends on your specific path. Everything has an opportunity cost.
 
Last edited:
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top