Lebesgue integral over the Riemann integral

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter symbol0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Riemann
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between the Lebesgue integral and the Riemann integral, specifically focusing on the conditions under which the limit of a sequence of functions can be interchanged with the integral. Participants explore examples where this interchange fails for the Riemann integral but holds for the Lebesgue integral.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the Lebesgue integral allows for the interchange of limit and integral under less stringent conditions compared to the Riemann integral, which requires uniform convergence.
  • One participant requests a specific example illustrating the advantage of the Lebesgue integral over the Riemann integral regarding this interchange.
  • Another participant suggests that if the Riemann integral exists, then the Lebesgue integral exists and is equal to it, implying a relationship between the two integrals.
  • A participant proposes that the switch fails for Riemann integrals when the limit function is not Riemann integrable but is Lebesgue integrable, using a sequence of bounded continuous functions converging to a function defined differently on rationals and irrationals as an example.
  • Further clarification is sought on whether the sequences for which the equality holds or fails in the Lebesgue context are the same as those in the Riemann context.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the terminology of "failure" in the context of integrals that do not exist, suggesting that a clearer example would involve sequences where both integrals exist but do not equal each other.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of examples illustrating the advantages of the Lebesgue integral. Some agree on the general principle that the Lebesgue integral can handle more cases than the Riemann integral, while others debate the specifics of what constitutes a valid example.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of the existence of integrals and the conditions under which the interchange of limits and integrals is valid, highlighting the nuances in definitions and theorems related to both types of integrals.

symbol0
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
You always see in books that one advantage of the Lebesgue integral over the Riemann integral is that a sequence of continuous functions f_n does not have to converge unifomly to a function f to have:
integral of the limit of the sequence = the limit of the integrals of functions in the sequence

Can anybody give me an example where this equality fails using the Riemann integral, and does not fail using the Lebesgue integral?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The advantage of the Lebesgue integral over the Riemann integral concerning the switching of the limit and integral sign is that for Riemann, the only theorem we have is that for the switching to be justified, the sequence of function must converge uniformly. But with the Lebesgue point of view, we have also the monotone convergence theorem and the dominated convergence theorem, which say that the switchiong is justified under very mild assumptions.

Note that you will not find an example where the switching fails using the Riemann integral, and does not fail using the Lebesgue integral because if the Riemann integral exists, then the Lebesgue integral exists and is equal to it.
 


Thanks quasar,
I don't think I understand completely.

Are you saying that the sequences for which the equality works/fails using the Lebesgue integral are the same sequences for which the equality works/fails correspondingly, using the Riemann integral?

If that's the case, can you give me a specific example where I can see how the Lebesgue integral gives me an advantage over the Riemann integral (regarding the switch of the limit and the integral).
 


symbol0 said:
Thanks quasar,
I don't think I understand completely.

Are you saying that the sequences for which the equality works/fails using the Lebesgue integral are the same sequences for which the equality works/fails correspondingly, using the Riemann integral?
Granted that we are talking about sequences of Riemann-integrable functions then yes.

symbol0 said:
If that's the case, can you give me a specific example where I can see how the Lebesgue integral gives me an advantage over the Riemann integral (regarding the switch of the limit and the integral).
Try to prove that given any sequence of positive,increasing and converging Riemann-integrable functions {f_n}, we have

[tex]\lim_n\int_a^b f_n =\int_a^b \lim_nf_n[/tex]

Or that given any sequence of converging Riemann-integrable functions {f_n} with |f_n|<g for some integrable function g, we have

[tex]\lim_n\int_a^b f_n =\int_a^b \lim_nf_n[/tex]

From what I understand, people did not know of these results before Lebesgue's thesis. And it is them that drew attention to Lebesgue's construction as a worthy alternative to Riemann's definition of the integral.
 


So then I guess that the answer to my original question (the example) is that the switch fails with the Riemann integral and does not fail with the Lebesgue integral for all those sequences of Riemann integrable functions where the limit of the sequence is not Riemann integrable, but it is Lebesgue integrable.

Say for instance a sequence of bounded continuous functions on [0,1] that converges to
f(x)= 0 if x is rational and 1 if x is irrational.
Then the switch would fail with the Riemann integral because f is not Riemann integrable, but the switch would not fail with the Lebesgue integral.

Right?
 


symbol0 said:
So then I guess that the answer to my original question (the example) is that the switch fails with the Riemann integral and does not fail with the Lebesgue integral for all those sequences of Riemann integrable functions where the limit of the sequence is not Riemann integrable, but it is Lebesgue integrable.

Well, if you insist, but it seems weird to say that the switching fails in this case since the notion of integral for the limit function does not even make sense. A real example of the switching failing would be if all the [itex]\int f_n[/itex] exist and converge and [itex]\int \lim_nf_n[/itex] exists but [itex]\lim_n \int f_n \neq\int \lim_nf_n[/itex]

symbol0 said:
Say for instance a sequence of bounded continuous functions on [0,1] that converges to
f(x)= 0 if x is rational and 1 if x is irrational.
Then the switch would fail with the Riemann integral because f is not Riemann integrable, but the switch would not fail with the Lebesgue integral.

Right?

I don't know if there is such a sequence of continuous functions, but if you let {r_n} denote a sequence that takes all the rational values in [0,1] and then set f_n(x)=1 if x=r_i (i=1,...,n) and 0 otherwise, then all the f_n are integrable but the limit is your function f.
 


Thanks quasar
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K