MHB Left hand and right hand limit at infinity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the limit of the function 1/x as x approaches 0 from both the left and right. The left-hand limit (LHL) as x approaches 0 from the negative side results in negative infinity, while the right-hand limit (RHL) as x approaches 0 from the positive side leads to positive infinity. Since the LHL and RHL do not converge to the same value, the overall limit does not exist. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these limits to grasp the behavior of the function near the point of discontinuity. Thus, the limit of 1/x as x approaches 0 is confirmed to be non-existent.
Joel Jacon
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Show that $\lim_{{x}\to{0}}$ $\frac{1}{x}$ does not exist?
Please tell me how to make LHL and RHL for this? Explain me all steps used?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
pcforgeek said:
Show that $\lim_{{x}\to{0}}$ $\frac{1}{x}$ does not exist?
Please tell me how to make LHL and RHL for this? Explain me all steps used?

Hi pcforgeek, (Wave)

Welcome to MHB!

We don't really give out answers or do problems fully for others, rather help you solve it yourself. So let's do that. :)

Ok, starting from the left: $$\lim_{{x}\to{0^-}}\frac{1}{x}$$

What do you get when you type in $$\frac{1}{-.5}$$ on your calculator? What about $$\frac{1}{-.1}$$? $$\frac{1}{-.01}$$? Notice that these numbers are walking closer and close to 0 from the negative side of it. Any idea where this trend is going?
 
Jameson said:
Hi pcforgeek, (Wave)

Welcome to MHB!

We don't really give out answers or do problems fully for others, rather help you solve it yourself. So let's do that. :)

Ok, starting from the left: $$\lim_{{x}\to{0^-}}\frac{1}{x}$$

What do you get when you type in $$\frac{1}{-.5}$$ on your calculator? What about $$\frac{1}{-.1}$$? $$\frac{1}{-.01}$$? Notice that these numbers are walking closer and close to 0 from the negative side of it. Any idea where this trend is going?

I already know that as the denominator becomes smaller and smaller and closer to zero the value becomes infinity. Can you tell me how to get right hand limit and left hand limit for this problem.
 
pcforgeek said:
I already know that as the denominator becomes smaller and smaller and closer to zero the value becomes infinity. Can you tell me how to get right hand limit and left hand limit for this problem.

I was showing you how to calculate the left hand limit actually, which does not approach infinity. Did you try what I asked? Try again and tell me what the trend is for values approaching 0 from the left. Plug in those values I suggested and you should see a pattern.
 
Jameson said:
I was showing you how to calculate the left hand limit actually, which does not approach infinity. Did you try what I asked? Try again and tell me what the trend is for values approaching 0 from the left. Plug in those values I suggested and you should see a pattern.

I finally understand now. LHL is negative infinity and RHL is positive infinity.
 
pcforgeek said:
I finally understand now. LHL is negative infinity and RHL is positive infinity.

That is correct! :)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Back
Top