Legendre Polynomials - expansion of an isotropic function on a sphere

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Legendre Polynomials in expanding isotropic functions on a sphere, specifically addressing the integration of a correlation function to derive the coefficients \(C_{l}\). The user expresses confusion regarding an integral that seems to yield an identity \(C_{l} = C_{l}\), indicating a potential oversight in their calculations. The integration process involves applying \(P_{l}\) to the correlation function, which simplifies the expression but raises questions about the correctness of the resulting coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Legendre Polynomials and their properties
  • Familiarity with spherical harmonics and their applications
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, particularly in the context of functions on a sphere
  • Experience with correlation functions in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Legendre Polynomials in detail
  • Learn about spherical harmonics and their role in isotropic function expansions
  • Review integral calculus techniques specific to spherical coordinates
  • Explore the application of correlation functions in physical models
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers working on spherical harmonics, isotropic functions, or those involved in advanced calculus and mathematical modeling.

petmal
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello.
I don't know what to do with one integral. I am sure it is something very simple, but I just don't see it...

For some reason I am not able to post the equations, so I am attaching them as a separatre file.

Many thanks for help.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Something is missing. It looks like the integration will give you an identity Cl=Cl.
 
mathman said:
Something is missing. It looks like the integration will give you an identity Cl=Cl.

Well, I want to get C_{l}, right? That is why I apply P_{l} on the correlation function (1) and integrate - it removes P_{l} and the sum leaving C_{l} * some factor in l. Where do you see a mistake?

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
920
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K