Length Contraction Problem for a Rod in a Spaceship

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the length contraction of a rod moving in a spaceship, with participants debating whether the rod is at rest relative to the spaceship. One participant argues that the problem statement indicates the rod is moving at 0.4c relative to Earth, suggesting it cannot be assumed to be at rest in the spaceship. Another points out that while the observer is at rest relative to the spaceship, the spaceship's velocity relative to the rod is unspecified. This ambiguity leads to different interpretations of the scenario, particularly regarding the implications of the rod's motion. The conversation highlights the complexities of relativistic physics and the importance of clearly defined reference frames.
Skyxplorer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A rod has length of 1m. It is moving in a spaceship with velocity 0.4c relative to the earth. The length of the rod measured by an observer in the spaceship will be

(A) 1m

(B) 0.9m

(C) 0.5m

(D) 0.25m
Relevant Equations
-
Shoudnt answer be A since for observer in spaceship rod is at rest.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes
 
Thank you for confirming
 
One might take is as a good assumption, but nowhere do I see it mentioned that the rod is at rest relative to the spaceship.

(In fact, it kind of says "it (the rod) is moving in a spceship" so I wouldn't be too quick with that assumption.)
 
DaveC426913 said:
One might take is as a good assumption, but nowhere do I see it mentioned that the rod is at rest relative to the spaceship.
In fact it clear from the statement that it (the rod) is moving
Skyxplorer said:
##\dots## with velocity 0.4c relative to the earth.
It is safe to assume that the observer is at rest relative to the spaceship, but we are not told the velocity of the spaceship (and observer) relative to the rod.

Answer (B) is consistent with the spaceship being parked on the Earth and the rod passing through two diametrically opposing openings at 0.4c but that's stretching it. :oldsmile:
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top