Let f be a continuous real function on a metric space X. Let

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the set Z(f), where f is a continuous real function on a metric space X and f(p) = 0, is closed. A key point is demonstrating that the complement X/Z(f) is open by using the definition of continuity. Participants suggest clarifying the metrics used and emphasize that the inverse image of closed sets under continuous functions is also closed. There is a reference to a potentially unclear solution from a UCLA Math website regarding the closure of {0} in R versus X. Ultimately, it is confirmed that since {0} is closed in R, the preimage f^(-1)({0}) is closed in X.
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Let f be a continuous real function on a metric space X. Let Z(f) be the set of all p in X at which f(p) = 0. Prove that Z(f) is closed.

Homework Equations



Definition of continuity on a metric space.

The Attempt at a Solution



Proof. We'll show that X/Z(f) = {p in X s.t. f(p) ≠ 0} is open. Choose p in X/Z(f). Since f is continuous, for every ε > 0 there exists a ∂ > 0 such that d(f(x),f(p)) < ε whenever d(x, p) < ∂.


... Unfortunately, I suffered a brain hemorrhage before I could finish this. I think I was trying to show that p is an interior point of X/Z(f). Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd look into getting the brain hemorrhage treated. What might be confusing you is that you are using 'd' for the metric on R as well as on X. How about writing the metric on R as |f(x)-f(p)|<epsilon. Now pick epsilon=|f(p)|/2. Can f(x) be zero?
 
Another approach: if f is continuous the inverse image of an open set is open, and the inverse image of a closed set is ..., and the subset {0} of the real numbers is ... in the reals.
 
Dick said:
I'd look into getting the brain hemorrhage treated. What might be confusing you is that you are using 'd' for the metric on R as well as on X. How about writing the metric on R as |f(x)-f(p)|<epsilon. Now pick epsilon=|f(p)|/2. Can f(x) be zero?

Hold on a sec ... Could you take a quick look at the solution on this UCLA Math website? http://www.math.ucla.edu/~elewis/Math230PDFs/Math%20230b%20HW1.pdf It's only 3 lines long and seems sketchy. How do we know that {0} is closed in our space X? If X = ℝ, then it would work out; but we're not given that.
 
Jamin2112 said:
Hold on a sec ... Could you take a quick look at the solution on this UCLA Math website? http://www.math.ucla.edu/~elewis/Math230PDFs/Math%20230b%20HW1.pdf It's only 3 lines long and seems sketchy. How do we know that {0} is closed in our space X? If X = ℝ, then it would work out; but we're not given that.

It does not say {0} is closed in X. It's says {0} is closed in R. Therefore f^(-1)({0}) is closed in X.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K