Libertarian Free Will and Moral Responsibility

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moridin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Free will
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of libertarian free will in moral responsibility, using a thought experiment involving two identical men in parallel universes—one who kills his wife and one who does not. It raises questions about how moral accountability can be assigned when the man's actions are independent of his desires, knowledge, and experiences. Participants argue that if actions are not caused by identifiable factors, then assigning moral responsibility becomes problematic. The conversation also touches on the nature of free will, suggesting that if it exists outside of deterministic or random causation, it complicates the notion of justice and punishment. Ultimately, the debate highlights the tension between free will and moral responsibility, questioning how one can be held accountable for actions that seem to lack a causal basis.
  • #31
Think of it this way: The only thing that differentiates a positive charge from a negative one is that they are opposite. There is nothing intrinsic to the nature of the charge itself such that one must be called "positive" and one must be called "negative". We could equally have switched these words. The only thing intrinsic to them is that they are opposite charges, and thus all physical laws remain identical if we only recognize that the opposite charges attract and identical charges repel. This includes the magnetic field as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
You seem to be missing the point here. The charges take different parts provided that you aim the magnetic field in the same direction. This is scientifically proven.

Take an arbitrary magnetic field. Send an electron through it. Then send the proton and you will notice the difference.

You are, in effect, actually arguing that we cannot separate an electron from a positron, which is quite mad.

There is nothing intrinsic to the nature of the charge itself such that one must be called "positive" and one must be called "negative".

A rose by any other name.
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 129 ·
5
Replies
129
Views
15K