Lie derivative of two left invariant vector fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lie derivative of a vector field Y along the flow σ_t of another vector field X is defined as L_X Y = lim_{ε→0} (1/ε)[Y|_x - (σ_ε)_* Y|_{σ_{-ε}(x)}], which equals the Lie bracket [X,Y]. In the context of left-invariant vector fields on a Lie group, the relation L_{a*}X|_g = X|_{a g} is established, indicating that left translation results from the flow of another vector field. The confusion arises because the flow σ_ε does not represent a left action but rather a diffeomorphism from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms σ_t, which leads to non-trivial commutation relations in the Lie algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie derivatives and vector fields
  • Familiarity with left-invariant vector fields
  • Knowledge of diffeomorphisms and their properties
  • Basic concepts of Lie groups and Lie algebras
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lie derivatives in differential geometry
  • Explore the structure of Lie algebras and their commutation relations
  • Learn about diffeomorphisms and their applications in manifold theory
  • Investigate the role of flows in vector field analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying differential geometry, particularly those focusing on Lie groups and vector field theory.

konik13
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I was following Nakahara's book and I really got my mind stuck with something. I would appreciate if anybody could help with this.

The Lie derivative of a vector field Y along the flow \sigma_t of another vector field X is defined as
L_X Y=lim_{\epsilon\to0}\frac{1}{\epsilon}\left[Y|_{x}-(\sigma_{\epsilon})_* Y|_{\sigma_{-\epsilon}(x)}\right]
wich is equal to the Lie bracket [X,Y].
Now when he goes on and defines the left invariant vector field X of a Lie group, this is given by demanding the relation
L_{a*}X|_g=X|_{a\,g}
where L_a is the left translation by a.

I guess we can assume that this left translation is the result of a flow of some other field.

My question is that since every left-invariant vector field defines a one parameter flow, why the Lie bracket of two left invariant vector fields doesn't vanish identically?

However, we know that the left invariant vector fields define the Lie algebra of the group and this has non-trivial commutation relations.

Thank you very much for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an old question, but since I stumbled upon it when the same confusion briefly bedeviled me after reading Nakahara, I decided to reply in case others follow a similar path. The key is that $\sigma_{\epsilon} (x)$ does not denote a left action. Instead, $\sigma_{\epsilon}$ denotes the diffeomorphism $\sigma_{t} $ with fixed $t=\epsilon$ from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms $\sigma_{t}$ (see Nakahara section 5.3.1). The diffeomorphism group $\sigma_{t}$ is the flow resulting from a vector field, but under $\sigma_{\epsilon}$ you send each point $x$ of the manifold (the manifold being a Lie group in the case discussed here) not to its image under a left action, but rather to the point the flow has reached after $\epsilon$ time elapses, if you start the flow from the point $x$.
 
Last edited:
idempotent1729 said:
This is an old question, but since I stumbled upon it when the same confusion briefly bedeviled me after reading Nakahara, I decided to reply in case others follow a similar path. The key is that $\sigma_{\epsilon} (x)$ does not denote a left action. Instead, $\sigma_{\epsilon}$ denotes the diffeomorphism $\sigma_{t} $ with fixed $t=\epsilon$ from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms $\sigma_{t}$ (see Nakahara section 5.3.1). The diffeomorphism group $\sigma_{t}$ is the flow resulting from a vector field, but under $\sigma_{\epsilon}$ you send each point $x$ of the manifold (the manifold being a Lie group in the case discussed here) not to its image under a left action, but rather to the point the flow has reached after $\epsilon$ time elapses, if you start the flow from the point $x$.

If I may, 1729 , let me latex-format your answer to make it easier to read (we use double pounds before - and after - to Latex-tag.:

This is an old question, but since I stumbled upon it when the same confusion briefly bedeviled me after reading Nakahara, I decided to reply in case others follow a similar path. The key is that ##\sigma_{\epsilon} (x) ## does not denote a left action. Instead, ##\sigma_{\epsilon} ## denotes the diffeomorphism ## \sigma_{t} ## with fixed ##t=\epsilon ## from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms ##\sigma_{t} ## (see Nakahara section 5.3.1). The diffeomorphism group ##\sigma_{t} ## is the flow resulting from a vector field, but under ##\sigma_{\epsilon} ## you send each point ##x ## of the manifold (the manifold being a Lie group in the case discussed here) not to its image under a left action, but rather to the point the flow has reached after ##\epsilon ## time elapses, if you start the flow from the point ##x ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: idempotent1729
WWGD said:
If I may, 1729 , let me latex-format your answer to make it easier to read (we use double pounds before - and after - to Latex-tag.:

This is an old question, but since I stumbled upon it when the same confusion briefly bedeviled me after reading Nakahara, I decided to reply in case others follow a similar path. The key is that ##\sigma_{\epsilon} (x) ## does not denote a left action. Instead, ##\sigma_{\epsilon} ## denotes the diffeomorphism ## \sigma_{t} ## with fixed ##t=\epsilon ## from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms ##\sigma_{t} ## (see Nakahara section 5.3.1). The diffeomorphism group ##\sigma_{t} ## is the flow resulting from a vector field, but under ##\sigma_{\epsilon} ## you send each point ##x ## of the manifold (the manifold being a Lie group in the case discussed here) not to its image under a left action, but rather to the point the flow has reached after ##\epsilon ## time elapses, if you start the flow from the point ##x ##
Thank you so much! I couldn't for the life of me figure it out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K