Graduate Why does the Lie group ##SO(N)## have ##n=\frac{N(N-1)}{2}## real parameters?

Click For Summary
The Lie group SO(N) has n = N(N-1)/2 real parameters due to the constraints imposed by orthogonal matrices, which satisfy the equation R^T R = I. This leads to n(n+1)/2 constraints in n^2 variables, resulting in n(n-1)/2 degrees of freedom. The relationship between the number of real parameters and the dimensions of the Lie algebra is established by linearizing group elements and ensuring they adhere to group properties. Specifically, the requirement that K^T + K = 0 indicates that K must have zeros along the diagonal, with upper triangular components mirroring the negative of lower triangular components. Consequently, the number of parameters for the group matches the dimension of the Lie algebra, confirming that SO(N) has n(n-1)/2 real parameters.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
When we have a Lie group, we want to obtain number of real parameters. In case of orthogonal matrices we have equation
R^{\text{T}}R=I,
that could be written in form
\sum_i R_{i,j}R_{i,k}=\delta_{j,k}.
For this real algebra ##SO(N)## there is ##n=\frac{N(N-1)}{2}## real parameters. Why this is the case when unitary matrix is not symmetric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LagrangeEuler said:
Why this is the case when unitary matrix is not symmetric?
Why is what the case? ##\dim U_n(\mathbb{C}) =n^2## and with the restriction ##\det =1## we get ##\dim SU_n(\mathbb{C})= n^2-1##
 
Orthogonal matrices are not necessarily symmetric, but since RTR is symmetric, we get at most n(n+1)/2 constraints in n^2 variables. Thus we are left n(n-1)/2 degrees of freedom, with some hand-waving involved.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
One approach is to note that the number of real parameters is the same as the dimensions of the Lie algebra. We consider a group element ##R## and linear-ize to first order to produce an element ##R' =R+\epsilon K ## which must obey the group properties up to first order.
$$\begin{align*}
&\Big(R^T + \epsilon K^T\Big)\Big(R+\epsilon K \Big)
=R^T R & + \epsilon(K^T R + R^T K) \\
&\text{at }R=I \text{ we must have }
&K^T + K = 0\end{align*}$$
Thus we must have zeros along the diagonal. The upper triangular matrix part of the matrix is just the negative transpose of the lower triangular matrix, that is ##K_{ij}=-K_{ji}##. So the number of real parameters for K is the same as the number of upper triangular components which is ##n(n-1)/2##. As the dimension of the Lie algebra and the group are the same, the number of parameters for the group is also ##n(n-1)/2##.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
847
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K