Lifeline Rope Strength Analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of lifeline rope strength, particularly homemade versus professionally made lifelines. The user calculates that the tension in an 8 mm rope reaches 27 kN, leading to a safety factor of 2, resulting in a load of 55 kN, which exceeds the breaking force of 35 kN for such ropes. The user questions the reliability of professional lifelines, which typically use 8 mm ropes, and seeks clarification on the nominal elastic modulus for wire ropes. The thread was closed with a recommendation to hire an engineer for a comprehensive safety inspection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rope tension calculations, including formulas for midspan load and tension in the rope.
  • Familiarity with safety harness specifications and rated arrest forces.
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically the elastic modulus of wire ropes.
  • Basic principles of safety factors in engineering design.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the nominal elastic modulus for various types of wire ropes.
  • Learn about safety factor calculations in fall protection systems.
  • Investigate professional lifeline standards and testing methods.
  • Explore advanced rope tension analysis techniques and software tools.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for safety engineers, rope manufacturers, and professionals involved in fall protection systems who need to ensure the reliability and safety of lifelines used in the workplace.

George Zucas
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

I am trying to analyse the lifelines we use at work, though the results I obtain are causing me headaches.

The problem is, our workers often install and use what I would call homemade lifelines. My boss asked me to check whether what they do is reliable. According to what I calculate, most of the professionaly made lifelines are too weak.

Here is what I have done so far:

I checked the safety harnesses we use at work. The rated arrest force is 6 kN (which is also the value mentioned in the standard we are bound to) which means when a user falls, after 6 kN of force is generated in the harness fall smoother ( whatever it is called) gets opened and the fall slows down. So the maximum force the lifeline is subjected to is 6 kN.

There are a few formulas used in analysing the ropes:

H=(w*L^2)/(8*d)

H: Midspan load
w: Unit load on the cable
L: Cable Span
d:sag

T= (H^2+((w*L/2)^2)^0.5

T: Tension in the Rope

What I need is the tension in the rope. When the rope gets loaded, it gets a V shape. So the calculation should be easy. The new rope length is sqrt(L^2-4d^2). The elongation is this new length minusthe initial length. The rope modulus is A*E/Linitial. Then the tension is elongation*modulus.

To translate the values to the harness, I found a formula from the link below which basically does what I do( and I copied some parts from there), it is 4T(s/l). Though I do not know where does it come from. After that I give random values to the sag until 6 kN harness force is reached.

http://sraa.asia/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/HLL-Basic-Calculation_final.pdf

When I do the calculation I get the same results which is 27 something kN for a 8 mm rope. With a safety factor of two the load is 55 kN. 8 mm diameter ropes have a breaking force of around 35 kN. 8 kn is too weak. If I increase the diameter, since the rope modulus is also dependent on the diameter, it is also not enough. So by increasing the diameter I figured only after around 15mm, I can say it is safe, which is a bit crazy to me since most of the official products have a 8 mm rope.

What do I do wrong? I cannot figure it out. The loads can't be that high. The official ones must have an even bigger safety factor since 2 is the minimum.

Also what is the nominal elastic modulus E for wire ropes? I cannot find any data on this. I used the value at the link but it does not specify the type of rope used.

I sumarised the calculation, there are other factors such as the initial sag etc but the results are about the same.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...

Edit: @George Zucas we have decided to leave this thread closed. Since this is a safety issue we recommend that you hire an engineer who can inspect and analyze the whole safety system involved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
960
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K