Life's great mysteries (things that make NO sense)

  • Thread starter Thread starter some bloke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    News
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around various everyday frustrations and confounding design choices, particularly focusing on touch screens in cars. Participants express concern over the safety implications of touch screens, especially when compared to traditional knobs and buttons that can be operated without visual attention. The conversation shifts to other topics, such as the inefficiency of snail-mail solicitations from charities, the use of QR codes in restaurants, and the perplexing behavior of tourists who prefer hotel pools over the ocean. The dialogue also touches on the complexities of air travel, including the need for arrival and departure screens at airports, and the reliability of airline information. Additionally, there are humorous observations about the absurdities of life, such as the design of paper towels and the peculiarities of fruit classification. Overall, the thread highlights a collective frustration with modern conveniences that complicate rather than simplify daily tasks.
  • #301
Bystander said:
People who say/use "diffuse" when they mean "defuse;" the words are NOT equivalent.
Irregardless! ;).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #302
"For all intensive purposes."

"It is a mute point."
I had a long talk with a colleague from Louisiana who said this. His view was, the "point" was meaningless, in other words, it "had nothing to say" about the issue at hand. Hence, it was a "mute" point. I was speechless.
 
  • #303
The whole IT thing, where you're expected to know about everything if you say you're in IT: setting up web pages, installing a router, databases, programming, etc. And just about everything else.
" Is that eclipse tonight a lunar eclipse?". " No Idea".
" Aren't you in IT?"
 
  • Haha
Likes hutchphd and berkeman
  • #304
Bystander said:
People who say/use "diffuse" when they mean "defuse;" the words are NOT equivalent.
It is of course possible, in certain circumstances, to do both at the same time. Angry crowds, for instance.
 
  • #305
Espresso does not have x in the spelling but...
 
  • #306
Jodo said:
Espresso does not have x in the spelling but...
I like to think of the name espresso having to do with the fact that it is brewed in single serving. It's not brewed in a big pot, all at once, that people share. Your espresso is brewed especially for you.
 
  • #307
collinsmark said:
I like to think of the name espresso having to do with the fact that it is brewed in single serving. It's not brewed in a big pot, all at once, that people share. Your espresso is brewed especially for you.
Yes. It is an EXPRESS serving, not an ESPRESS serving.
 
Last edited:
  • #308
collinsmark said:
espresso
It means pressed out, expressed by pressure.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes gmax137 and sysprog
  • #309
Sure, it's all that. But it's brewed especially for you. (Not expecially or esspecially.)
 
  • Haha
Likes Keith_McClary
  • #310
I'm getting dizzy... o0)
 
  • #311
Bystander said:
People who say/use "diffuse" when they mean "defuse;" the words are NOT equivalent.
I actually came across the opposite the other day - a travel mug with a built in "defuser". As carried by the bomb squad, presumably - it does get hot in that protective gear and it's nice to have a cold drink built into your tools. (Not sure if it was actually meant for tea or a water filter or what.)
 
  • #312
berkeman said:
I'm getting dizzy... o0)
Have an Ex/Ess/Etc presso. It will help you settle/xettle.
 
  • Haha
Likes phinds and berkeman
  • #313
Some PF members within the extablished community here exchew the spelling of espresso with es- in favor of the higher exteemed ex-, expousing that it more exoterically resembles the exsential meaning, and perhaps expousing that the ex- is more exthetically pleasing, and the es- in espresso should be excorted out the door. But by my extimation, extranging the es- is in error, and detracts from the exsence of espresso.

Putting it another way, some words in my opinion, like espresso, are fine with the es-.
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes nuuskur, BillTre and Bystander
  • #314
I used to get upset at the use of the expression " At a Fraction of the Cost", since it assumed fractions were less than 1, while they can be equal to 1,000 ,000/1 or larger.
But I have come to ignore it, since I thought I was being pedantic.
 
  • Haha
Likes Keith_McClary
  • #315
WWGD said:
I used to get upset at the use of the expression " At a Fraction of the Cost", since it assumed fractions were less than 1, while they can be equal to 1,000 000/1 or larger.
That would not be proper.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes WWGD, Keith_McClary and berkeman
  • #316
WWGD said:
fractions
Shhh, don't let any marketing types know that!
 
  • #317
These stupid
1644965679850.png

bumper stickers!
This is baby en route:
1644965722487.png
This is baby on route:
1644965787174.png
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes pinball1970, Filip Larsen, DrClaude and 7 others
  • #318
Keith_McClary said:
It means pressed out, expressed by pressure.
Yes. That's what the big lever is for . . .

1645131400301.png
 
  • #319
sysprog said:
Yes. That's what the big lever is for . . .

View attachment 297243
I love the esthetics of many of those machines, like the Faemas. Would consider buying one just for show if they weren't $1,000+ a pop.
 
  • #320
Yeah I want a coppertone La Pavoni. Just for show.
I have a Capresso manual electric pump machine that I use daily and would recommend without reservation (around $100 as I recall). Doesn't give you coffee biceps though.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, sysprog and Keith_McClary
  • #321
hutchphd said:
Yeah I want a coppertone La Pavoni. Just for show.
I have a Capresso manual electric pump machine that I use daily and would recommend without reservation (around $100 as I recall). Doesn't give you coffee biceps though.
Why without reservations?.Native Americans want espresso too!
 
  • #322
(Some of these may be retreads. tuff. They keep me awake at nights. They should do the same to you.)

  • There exist simple, English sentences that can be spoken correctly but cannot be written correctly.

  • The fraction of living human skeletons to living human people is slightly great than one.

  • There exist numbers, used in peer-reviewed papers, that are so stupid large, they cannot be written out in the volume of the visible universe, even if each digit were no more than a Planck length in size. In fact, the number that is merely the number of digits in the aforementioned number likewise cannot be written in the volume of the visible universe. Yea verily, even the number that is merely the number of digits of the number that is merely the number of digits in the aforementioned number is too large to fit in the visible universe, even if the digits are a Planck length in size.

  • There exist concepts so dangerous that - were you simply made aware of them and nothing more - can conceivably doom your unborn descendants to a life of pain, suffering and torture beyond your control.
 
Last edited:
  • #323
  • "There are three ways to spell the word 'to'".

  • Pregnant women contain more than the average number of skeletons.

  • Remember, you were warned. Reading on makes you complicit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and Keith_McClary
  • #324
I've always loved Pascal's Wager
 
  • #325
DaveC426913 said:
"There are three ways to spell the word 'to'".
Correction: There is only one way to spell the word "to", but three ways to spell the sound "/tu/" (IPA); and many more in other languages.
DaveC426913 said:
Didn't know about that. Wow, just wow! If there was an award for the most non-sensical subject on this thread, I would probably vote for that one.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander, phinds, russ_watters and 1 other person
  • #326
jack action said:
If there was an award for the most non-sensical subject on this thread, I would probably vote for that one.
Yes. That article gets my vote for the hardest thing to read this month: GET TO THE F#$@!%^$ POINT ALREADY!

OTOH, I didn't succeed in really reading it, but I did skim the whole thing. I don't do well with that sort of "Deepak Chopra word salad" style.
 
  • #327
jack action said:
Correction: There is only one way to spell the word "to", but three ways to spell the sound "/tu/" (IPA); and many more in other languages.
Perhaps you missed the preamble, which was laid out in post 322.
 
  • #328
DaveE said:
Yes. That article gets my vote for the hardest thing to read this month: GET TO THE F#$@!%^$ POINT ALREADY!

OTOH, I didn't succeed in really reading it, but I did skim the whole thing. I don't do well with that sort of "Deepak Chopra word salad" style.
Yeah, I hummed and hawed over what to link to. There are two links there, BTW. The other one is to a rationaWiki article, but that one goes in a slightly different direction - with simulations.
 
  • #329
DaveC426913 said:
Perhaps you missed the preamble, which was laid out in post 322.
Which brings up a new one for me: Why do we have a preamble without having 'ambles'.
Or feeling overwhelmed, underwhelmed, without the option of feeling 'Whelmed'?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DaveC426913, jack action, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #330
WWGD said:
Which brings up a new one for me: Why do we have a preamble without having 'ambles'.
Or feeling overwhelmed, underwhelmed, without the option of feeling 'Whelmed'?
Even 'Underwhelmed' is or was a jokey journalistic sort of wordplay on one of those words that don't/didn't have an opposite. A bit reminiscent of 'software'. Not done extensive research, but see the usage history graph here: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/underwhelmed
Big contrast with that here
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/overwhelmETA just thought of another example: 'gruntled'. Its history is quite well known: https://www.analyticalgrammar.com/disgruntled-and-gruntled/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K