Life's great mysteries (things that make NO sense)

  • Thread starter Thread starter some bloke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    News
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around various everyday frustrations and confounding design choices, particularly focusing on touch screens in cars. Participants express concern over the safety implications of touch screens, especially when compared to traditional knobs and buttons that can be operated without visual attention. The conversation shifts to other topics, such as the inefficiency of snail-mail solicitations from charities, the use of QR codes in restaurants, and the perplexing behavior of tourists who prefer hotel pools over the ocean. The dialogue also touches on the complexities of air travel, including the need for arrival and departure screens at airports, and the reliability of airline information. Additionally, there are humorous observations about the absurdities of life, such as the design of paper towels and the peculiarities of fruit classification. Overall, the thread highlights a collective frustration with modern conveniences that complicate rather than simplify daily tasks.
  • #271
Jarvis323 said:
Did anyone mention tip screens on ipads at places people previously didn't tip. People are now getting tips for taking your money. This didn't make sense until 2020.

Another one is commercials during trailers for movies; basically commercials during commercials. How long until the commercial commercials have commercials too?
From time to time I will search You Tube for a commercial and have to watch a commercial to see it.
 
  • Haha
Likes Keith_McClary and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #272
Ivan Seeking said:
From time to time I will search You Tube for a commercial and have to watch a commercial to see it.
Yes, but is it a commercial for a competing product? Now *that* would be smart advertising! :wink:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes BillTre, hutchphd, Ivan Seeking and 1 other person
  • #273
BillTre said:
The lay fish designation is an older term than the fish as defined by biology.
Its seems to just refer to some animal living in the water. This meaning has been around for a long time.

Shellfish is another good example: molluscs and crustaceans (and maybe some other things).
Neither are anything like a fish (to biology), and they aren't even closely related to each other.
This has even come up in law. there are old treaties defining fishing rights. One case came up invoking a treaty of, if I remember, the 13th century. Some category or other was entitled to take fish from certain seas (this was in the Channel Islands if I remember) but they were taking lobsters etc. which was contested.It was ruled that lobsters were fish at the time of the treaty.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary and BillTre
  • #274
epenguin said:
This has even come up in law. there are old treaties defining fishing rights.
Moby Dick, the "Royal Fish."
 
  • #275
What makes no sense?

William Shatner will go to space in about a week aboard Blue Origin. He has been to space many, many times. He should give someone else a chance.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes jtbell, Keith_McClary, DaveC426913 and 1 other person
  • #276
Ivan Seeking said:
What makes no sense?

William Shatner will go to space in about a week aboard Blue Origin. He has been to space many, many times. He should give someone else a chance.

st tumblr_mubbrdAQdf1r60h6bo3_250.gif

st tumblr_mubbrdAQdf1r60h6bo4_250.gif
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and BillTre
  • #278
Vanadium 50 said:
Camouflage? How about US Navy blue camouflage uniforms:

View attachment 289814
I think the point is that if they fall overboard, the enemy will not be able to find them. I'm not sure this has been thought through all the way.
 
  • Like
Likes Ivan Seeking, Vanadium 50 and Twigg
  • #279
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913 and BillTre
  • #280
Ivan Seeking said:
He just hopes nothing is outside and looking back.
Something on the wing??
 
  • #281
DaveC426913 said:
Something on the wing??
OMG! I didn't even think of that!
 
  • #282
1633577069531.png

JEEEEEEEFFFFFFFFF!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970 and Ivan Seeking
  • #283
So I was reading about quantum tunneling, and then I noticed google started suggesting I search "isolated tetrahedra". Is there a particular reason for this connection? People who search for information about quantum tunneling also search for information about isolated tetrahedra?

isolated_tetrahedra.png
 
  • #284
Jarvis323 said:
So I was reading about quantum tunneling, and then I noticed google started suggesting I search "isolated tetrahedra". Is there a particular reason for this connection? People who search for information about quantum tunneling also search for information about isolated tetrahedra?

View attachment 296111
No, it's suggesting searches that begin with the letters "is..."
 
  • #285
DrGreg said:
No, it's suggesting searches that begin with the letters "is..."
I know that. The mystery is why it has personalized the list it generates for me to place "isolated tetrahedra" at the top.
 
  • #286
Jarvis323 said:
I know that. The mystery is why it has personalized the list it generates for me to place "isolated tetrahedra" at the top.
You could retire tomorrow and buy a small Caribbean island if you can figure out google's suggestion algorithm. I think it's more secret than the nuclear launch codes, and certainly changes more often.

It also seems remarkably stupid sometimes.
 
  • #287
DaveE said:
You could retire tomorrow and buy a small Caribbean island if you can figure out google's suggestion algorithm. I think it's more secret than the nuclear launch codes, and certainly changes more often.

It also seems remarkably stupid sometimes.
The default suggestions I get for a-z at least don't seem too mysterious.

1643314302058.png

Maybe one day google's search suggestion algorithm will discover a theory of everything, and then we'll slowly figure it out over time as it unknowingly steers us in the right direction.

Or maybe if it discovers a theory of everything, it will just internally try to leverage it somehow to maximize advertising revenue.
 
  • Haha
Likes Klystron and hutchphd
  • #288
@Jarvis323
...I was reading about quantum tunneling, and then I noticed google started suggesting I search "isolated tetrahedra".

If the suggestions and/or search results seem out-of-wack, remove the Google cookies from the browser.

My searches vary from 'everyday mundane' to rather technical. When the technical searches start returning grade school stuff, I clear the Google cookie crumbs and all of a sudden Google Scholar results start showing up.

Try it; you'll like it! :))

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Jarvis323, Klystron, Keith_McClary and 1 other person
  • #290
Since I'm using Windows, the browsers have cookie removal capability built-in. On the toolbar (usually at the top) it typically appears under:
Tools
Preferences
Privacy
Show Cookies

You can also completely disable cookies (with an exception list if desired), or delete at end-of-session. (Often the deletion really occurs at the next browser start-up rather than upon closing)
 
  • #291
Tom.G said:
Since I'm using Windows, the browsers have cookie removal capability built-in. On the toolbar (usually at the top) it typically appears under:
Tools
Preferences
Privacy
Show Cookies

You can also completely disable cookies (with an exception list if desired), or delete at end-of-session. (Often the deletion really occurs at the next browser start-up rather than upon closing)
The bookmarklet is one click to remove the cookies for the site you're on. Now that many sites are popping up a cookies dialog bar at the footer, that says accept all cookies or manage cookie preferences, I usually hit accept all and then remove cookies.
 
  • #292
You can also use search engines like DuckDuckGo that don't track your previous searches. Google tries to match result to your previous searches.
 
  • Like
Likes Jarvis323, Klystron and sysprog
  • #293
WWGD said:
You can also use search engines like DuckDuckGo that don't track your previous searches. Google tries to match result to your previous searches.
Also run cleaning programs, free or 'professional' versions, at OS and browser startup a/o shutdown that eliminate cookies and other internet residue, as you prefer.
 
  • Like
Likes Jarvis323 and WWGD
  • #294
Klystron said:
Also run cleaning programs, free or 'professional' versions, at OS and browser startup a/o shutdown that eliminate cookies and other internet residue, as you prefer.
If I may say so, Google's strategy of returning results that match previous searches has helped promote radicalization in that ittends to keep people in their own bubbles by returning results/data within the range of one's experience, and not allowing new ones.
 
  • #295
WWGD said:
If I may say so, Google's strategy of returning results that match previous searches has helped promote radicalization in that ittends to keep people in their own bubbles by returning results/data within the range of one's experience, and not allowing new ones.
They now have algorithms to downrank sites that disagree with the mainstream media.
 
  • #296
MikeeMiracle said:
Is this post just about technology or can we post stuff about people to? The thing I fail to understand is people who spends countless thousands of pounds to go on holiday to a hot country, stay in a hotel a hundred yards from the beach...and then go swimming in the hotel pool instead of the Sea!

It make zero sense to me, you could have swam in a pool in your own town...
Well where I come from it is logical. For 6 Month of the year you have Box Jellyfish, all year round you get your Sharks, and now Saltwater Crocodiles are speculating on Tourists for lunch or dinner.
 
  • #297
WWGD said:
Google tries to match result to your previous searches.
Dear Google,
If my previous search results yielded what I wanted I wouldn't be searching AGAIN! :headbang:
 
  • #298
WWGD said:
Google tries to match result to your previous searches.

Lol. . . there's no question about it. . . . :wink:

1643449641506.png


.
 
  • #299
Lupo said:
Well where I come from it is logical. For 6 Month of the year you have Box Jellyfish, all year round you get your Sharks, and now Saltwater Crocodiles are speculating on Tourists for lunch or dinner.
Yes, one can add riptides, sharp rocks, 'rogue' waves, cold water, strong currents, kelp tangles, live and dead jellyfish, oil and sewer spills, stoned surfers and boogey boarders, and sociopathic yachtsmen firing guns near shore to the dangers of open ocean swimming. Growing up close to famous beaches in Northern California, I loved ocean swimming while always maintaining a sharp eye for hazards.

Saltwater improves buoyancy and allows chlorination via electrolysis. A heated properly maintained saltwater swimming pool provides the best of both environments IMO.
 
  • #300
People who say/use "diffuse" when they mean "defuse;" the words are NOT equivalent.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K