- 19,378
- 15,614
It would be WAY more bloody, especially in Ireland and ScotlandIvan Seeking said:I wonder how much different history would be if nobody drank alcohol.
This thread invites participants to share and discuss various aspects of modern life that they find perplexing or nonsensical. Topics range from automobile controls and restaurant practices to direct mail marketing strategies and airport terminal displays. The discussion encompasses personal anecdotes, observations, and critiques of contemporary societal norms and technologies.
Participants express a variety of opinions on the discussed topics, with no clear consensus on the merits or drawbacks of modern practices. Disagreements arise regarding the effectiveness and user-friendliness of technology in everyday situations.
Some discussions highlight the influence of societal changes, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, on consumer behavior and expectations, while others reflect on personal preferences that may not align with current trends.
This discussion may be of interest to individuals curious about contemporary societal norms, technology in daily life, and the evolving nature of consumer experiences.
It would be WAY more bloody, especially in Ireland and ScotlandIvan Seeking said:I wonder how much different history would be if nobody drank alcohol.
Way more? Maybe all the booze helps drive the wars. Booze makes many people aggressive and violent.phinds said:It would be WAY more bloody, especially in Ireland and Scotland![]()
Ivan Seeking said:I wonder how much different history would be if nobody drank alcohol.
There is also issues of water supply, disease control, and nutrition.collinsmark said:I've given this some thought, I and think the world, and even mankind's physical evolution, would be significantly/measurably different. Maybe not wildly different, but measurable.
And I'm speaking physical evolution, aside from the obvious cultural evolution.
I posit that the cultivation of alcoholic beverages may be one of the most profound, man-made influences on human evolution: up there with fire.
My speculation is based on the alcohol's eons-long running application to human reproductive habits.
(This is all speculation, of course.)
Hitler did not drink much if at all taking only low alcoholic beer occasionally. The Third Reich frowned on excessive drinking.Ivan Seeking said:I wonder how much different history would be if nobody drank alcohol.
Makes no sense: Leaders making crucial decisions while drinking. I wonder how many wars might have been avoided.
Abstract
Alcohol and tobacco use did not fit well with National Socialist aesthetics. However, these substances were not proscribed in Nazi Germany in spite of the heavy penalties for excessive use: Alcoholics were sterilized, and smoking by children was a criminal offense. This article argues that the great demand of the German people for these products prevented the authoritarian regime from alcohol and tobacco prohibition but measures were taken by the Nazis to reduce tobacco and alcohol consumption in the next generation.