Lifetime & Branching ratio

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter malawi_glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amp Lifetime Ratio
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of particle lifetime and branching ratios in the context of particle decay, specifically referencing an equation from the book "Particle Physics" by Martin & Shaw. Participants explore the relationship between lifetime, decay rates, and branching ratios, aiming to clarify why the branching ratio is included in the equation for lifetime.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the branching ratio (B) is included in the equation for lifetime, suggesting that lifetime should simply be the inverse of the decay rate.
  • Another participant clarifies that the decay rate referenced is not the total decay rate but rather the decay rate for a specific mode, indicating that lifetime must account for the total decay rate.
  • A further explanation is provided that if the decay rate for a specific mode is less than the total decay rate, the lifetime must be adjusted to reflect this, necessitating the use of the branching ratio to compensate for the longer lifetime associated with that specific decay mode.
  • A participant expresses understanding of the concept after the explanations, indicating a potential gap in their prior understanding of lifetime.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to reach a mutual understanding regarding the inclusion of the branching ratio in the lifetime equation, although initial confusion exists about the concept of lifetime itself.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the broader implications of lifetime and branching ratios, nor does it clarify all assumptions regarding decay modes and their rates.

malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
2,436
[SOLVED] Lifetime & Branching ratio

Hi!

In my book Particle Physics by Martin & Shaw, eq 2.15:

Lifetime:
[tex]\tau _l = \dfrac{B(l^- \rightarrow e^-\bar{\nu }_e\nu _l )}{\Gamma (l^-\rightarrow e^-\bar{\nu }_e\nu _l )}[/tex]

Where B is branching ratio and Gamma the decay rate and l is a lepton.

Why is B included? :S I thought the lifetime just was the inverse of the decay rate...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
malawi_glenn said:
Hi!

In my book Particle Physics by Martin & Shaw, eq 2.15:

Lifetime:
[tex]\tau _l = \dfrac{B(l^- \rightarrow e^-\bar{\nu }_e\nu _l )}{\Gamma (l^-\rightarrow e^-\bar{\nu }_e\nu _l )}[/tex]

Where B is branching ratio and Gamma the decay rate and l is a lepton.

Why is B included? :S I thought the lifetime just was the inverse of the decay rate...

Because this decay rate is not the total decay rate, it's only the decay rat efor that particular mode. The lifetime is the inverse of the total decay rate.
 
malawi_glenn said:
Hi!

In my book Particle Physics by Martin & Shaw, eq 2.15:

Lifetime:
[tex]\tau _l = \dfrac{B(l^- \rightarrow e^-\bar{\nu }_e\nu _l )}{\Gamma (l^-\rightarrow e^-\bar{\nu }_e\nu _l )}[/tex]

Where B is branching ratio and Gamma the decay rate and l is a lepton.

Why is B included? :S I thought the lifetime just was the inverse of the decay rate...

Well, assuming that;

[tex]\Gamma (l^-\rightarrow e^-\bar{\nu }_e\nu _l ) < \Gamma (l^-\rightarrow anything)[/tex]

you must compensate for the longer lifetime that would occur if you restricted the lepton to that one decay mode. Compensating will require you to consider the ratio of this decay mode versus any available decay mode, which is the branching ratio in the posted equation. Thus, dividing the branching ratio, which is less than or equal to one, by the partial width, which is less than or equal to the total width, is the logical solution.
 
Ok i think I understand now, perhaps I have not understand the concept of lifetime proper yet. Thanx!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K