Light absorption and reflection

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Drude-Lorentz model's explanation of light interaction with matter, specifically regarding the complex wave-number k. The real part of k indicates light propagation, while the imaginary part represents damping effects. When Re(k)=0 and Im(k)≠0, the resulting evanescent wave suggests that light is absorbed rather than reflected. However, the reflectance coefficient at resonance frequency being 1 implies complete reflection with no absorption, raising questions about the apparent contradiction of resonance absorption. The inquiry seeks clarity on these concepts in the context of light behavior in materials.
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi there!
I have a question about the classical interaction of light with matter according the Drude-Lorentz model. Let's suppose that the light in matter has a wave-number k which in general is complex. Then the real part of k accounts for the propagation of light, while the imaginary part of k is a dumping factor. Can I figure out the behavior of light? I mean, e.g. if Re(k)=0 and Im(k)\neq0 then I have an evanescent wave: does this mean that light is absorbed or reflected?
Thank you
 
Science news on Phys.org
Uhm.. sorry, but I'm not english... don't you answer because my english is too bad that you don't understand the question or just because you don't know the answer?
In the former case I'll try to put it in other words:

The reflectance coefficient at a resonance frequency (k->infinity) is 1, therefore the light beam is reflected entirely and there is no absorption. But at a resonance frequency, shouldn't I get a resonance absorption?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
21K
Replies
1
Views
1K