Light Speed Q&A: Can Cameras Capture Light?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohd Abdullah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Light speed Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on advanced camera technology capable of capturing light at unprecedented speeds, specifically a camera that can record 1 trillion frames per second, with mentions of a 4 trillion frames per second camera developed by Japanese scientists. Participants express skepticism about the ability of these cameras to capture light itself, suggesting that the recordings may represent slower phenomena rather than light traveling at its actual speed. The technology relies on electronic switching of photodetectors to achieve rapid shutter speeds, allowing for the intensity distribution of pixels to be recorded over multiple frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of high-speed imaging technology
  • Familiarity with photodetector mechanisms
  • Knowledge of light pulse behavior and intensity distribution
  • Basic principles of frame rate and shutter speed in photography
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "high-speed imaging techniques" for capturing fast phenomena
  • Explore "photodetector technology" and its applications in imaging
  • Learn about "light pulse propagation" and its implications in physics
  • Investigate "frame rate optimization" in video technology
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in optical physics, engineers in imaging technology, and enthusiasts interested in the capabilities of high-speed cameras and their applications in capturing light phenomena.

Mohd Abdullah
Messages
99
Reaction score
3
Hi,

Are anyone here familiar with this?

It shows a camera that can capture 1 trillion frames per second, and the camera can be used to record the speed of light. The other day, I saw an article when I was searching something on Google and it said a 4 trillion camera were created by Japanese scientists and it also can be used to record light.

But I doubt that those cameras can actually record something that is moving at light speed, let alone recording the light itself. In my opinion, what they were recorded were actually not light itself and I think they were recording something that was actually moving much slower than light. Thoughts?
 
Science news on Phys.org
They did record the light, but they didn't capture it all in one go.

As I understand it, they can capture a single string of pixels' intensities with a "shutter speed" that's phenomenally fast, because of electronic switching of the photodetectors instead of actual shutters.
What they do is shoot the pulse of light again and again, to get the intensity distribution of every pixel over the total number of frames needed for the movie. It would be a painstaking and laborious process if computers weren't so good at what they do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K