Light years-distance or light travel time?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chip Orr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Time Travel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of light years (LY) in the context of astronomical distances and light travel time, particularly at large scales such as 10 billion light years. Participants explore whether using light years implies both distance and light travel time or just distance, and how the expansion of space affects these measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether stating a distance in light years also conveys the light travel time, especially at distances like 10 billion light years, and mentions the Hubble constant's role in this context.
  • Another participant asserts that a light year is strictly a measure of distance, defined by the distance a photon travels in one year, and suggests that the Hubble constant does not affect this definition.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether the light travel time for a distance of 10 billion light years is exactly 10 billion years or longer due to the expansion of space.
  • A later reply explains that while light travels 10 billion light years in 10 billion years, the light ray will be farther away than 10 billion light years upon arrival due to the expansion of space during that time, introducing the concepts of proper distance and light travel distance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether light years encompass both distance and light travel time, leading to an unresolved discussion regarding the implications of cosmic expansion on these measurements.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the need for clarity in definitions, particularly between proper distance and light travel distance, and the implications of cosmic expansion on these concepts. There are unresolved assumptions regarding how these definitions interact at large distances.

Chip Orr
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If I use light years to describe large reception distances,say 10 billion,am I also stateing the light travel time? The way I figure it at these distances you would have to increase the light travel time useing the Hubble constant to quantify the increase in space a photon would have to travel. Kind of like swiming against a current to reach a destination.Parasecs are what I should state as a distance modulus at these lengths,but that doesn't describe light travel time. So,when useing LYs are you stateing distance & light travel time or just distance? This has been bugging me for a while now! Please help me out with this one. Thanks.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Light year is distance, defined by distance a photon travels in one year. Don't worry about Hubble constant - it doesn't effect the definition.
 
At 10 billion LYs is the light travel time 10 billion years,or is it longer due to the expansion of space? Thanks ,Chip
 
Chip Orr said:
At 10 billion LYs is the light travel time 10 billion years,or is it longer due to the expansion of space? Thanks ,Chip
Light always travels 10 billion light-years in 10 billion years. However, when you send a light ray and wait 10 billion years, it will be located farther away than 10 billion light-years from you on a surface of simultaneity (of constant time) in the universe, because the space between you and the light ray has expanded during the 10 billion years of travel.

The distance between you and the light ray can be expressed according to both definitions. The proper distance, for the distance on a surface of constant time (which is by the way the one that enters the Hubble law) and the light travel distance, for the distance traveled by light. You just have to make clear which one is being used. And, of course, you can express both in light-years or in parsec.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K