Lightning Rod Tip Radii: Why So Small?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter amaresh92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lightning Rod
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
amaresh92
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
greetings,
why the radii of the tip of lightning rod is small(few mm)?
thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hiamaresh92! :smile:

put a lightning rod near a flat metal plate …

what will happen if you place a charge near them? :wink:
 
The electric field is greater where the radius of curvature of the end is smaller.
 
Meir Achuz said:
The electric field is greater where the radius of curvature of the end is smaller.

because at a point of increasing radius of curvature, if two charges on opposite sides are at equal distances measured along the surface, the one on the side of smaller radius of curvature will be actually nearer …

so in equilibrium, …

ooh, that's the wrong result, isn't it? :cry:

ah … let's start again o:)

at radius of curvature r, the amount of charge in an arc between fixed distances s and s + ds (measured in 3D space, not along the surface) will be less for greater r (by a factor cos(s/r), the radius of the arc), and its component along the surface will also be less (by a factor cos(s/2r)) …

so for smaller r, s/r is larger and so cos(s/r) and cos(s/2r) are smaller, and so the amount of charge and its "component" (loosely speaking) at a fixed distance is smaller, so the repulsive force will be smaller on the side of decreasing r

so in equilibrium, there must be a higher charge density at decreasing r! :smile:

(does anyone know the exact dependency on curvature?)
 
A simple case is a conducting sphere of radius R with a charge Q.
How does the field at the surface depend on R?
 
Meir Achuz said:
A simple case is a conducting sphere of radius R with a charge Q.
How does the field at the surface depend on R?

?? :confused: R is constant.