Limit as x approaches 0 for given function

  • Thread starter Thread starter needingtoknow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of the function as x approaches 0, specifically the expression involving square roots and the analysis of cases for x greater than and less than 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the simplification of the limit expression and question the placement of absolute value signs in the denominator. There is also a mention of a potential typo in the problem statement.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring the reasoning behind the use of absolute values and clarifying the mathematical principles involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the equality of the square root of x squared and the absolute value of x.

Contextual Notes

There is a suggestion that the original problem statement may contain a typo, which could affect the interpretation of the limit being evaluated.

needingtoknow
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



lim x --> 0 for the function sqrt((1/x^2)-(1/x)) - sqrt((1/x^2)-(1/x))

Analyze the cases x > 0 and x < 0

The Attempt at a Solution



The solutions book simplifies the expression to

2x/(abs(x)*(sqrt(1+x)+sqrt(1-x)))

I know how to evaluate the limit from here. But I'm wondering why did they only place the absolute value sign for the single x in the denominator that multiplies with this (sqrt(1+x)+sqrt(1-x)) expression. Why isn't the absolute value sign around every single x?The answer is that the limit doesn't exist.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
needingtoknow said:

Homework Statement



lim x --> 0 for the function sqrt((1/x^2)-(1/x)) - sqrt((1/x^2)-(1/x))

Analyze the cases x > 0 and x < 0

The Attempt at a Solution



The solutions book simplifies the expression to

2x/(abs(x)*(sqrt(1+x)+sqrt(1-x)))

I know how to evaluate the limit from here. But I'm wondering why did they only place the absolute value sign for the single x in the denominator that multiplies with this (sqrt(1+x)+sqrt(1-x)) expression. Why isn't the absolute value sign around every single x?


The answer is that the limit doesn't exist.

It looks like maybe your problem statement has a typo, but that doesn't seem to matter to the question that you asked.

The absolute value comes into play because ##\sqrt{x^2}=|x|##.
 
Why isn't the absolute value sign around every single x?
Why do you expect one?
 
Ohh right I forgot out that equality. So you're saying all they did was sub in abs(x) wherever there as x^2?
 
needingtoknow said:

Homework Statement



lim x --> 0 for the function sqrt((1/x^2)-(1/x)) - sqrt((1/x^2)-(1/x))

Analyze the cases x > 0 and x < 0

The Attempt at a Solution



The solutions book simplifies the expression to

2x/(abs(x)*(sqrt(1+x)+sqrt(1-x)))

I know how to evaluate the limit from here. But I'm wondering why did they only place the absolute value sign for the single x in the denominator that multiplies with this (sqrt(1+x)+sqrt(1-x)) expression. Why isn't the absolute value sign around every single x?


The answer is that the limit doesn't exist.

Your question must have a "typo" in it; what you have written is ##\sqrt{f(x)} - \sqrt{f(x)}##, which is identically 0 for all positive values of ##f(x) = 1/x^2 - 1/x.##
 
needingtoknow said:
Ohh right I forgot out that equality. So you're saying all they did was sub in abs(x) wherever there as x^2?
It just appears once. They replaced ##\sqrt{x^2}## by abs(x) (note the square root), because ##\sqrt{x^2} = |x|##.
 
needingtoknow said:
Ohh right I forgot out that equality. So you're saying all they did was sub in abs(x) wherever there as x^2?

No. I'm saying that they used the equality, ##\sqrt{x^2}=|x|##, as part of rewriting the given algebraic expression in way that is more easily analyzed in the context of this problem.

One could say that they replaced certain instances of ##\sqrt{x^2}## with instances of ##|x|##.

I don't like the word "substitute" to describe what is going on here. I can't exactly put my finger on why I don't like it. It just seems like the wrong word to use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K