Limit of (1+ln x)/x as x -> 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fre4k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of the expression (1 + ln x) / x as x approaches 0. Participants are exploring the behavior of the natural logarithm and its relationship with x in this limit context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to apply L'Hopital's Rule, while others question its applicability, noting that the limit does not present an indeterminate form. There are discussions about the behavior of ln x as x approaches 0 and how it influences the overall limit.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants express confusion regarding the limit's definition from both sides, while others clarify that the natural logarithm is not defined for negative values, suggesting that the limit should be considered only from the positive side.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the limit's evaluation is complicated by the fact that division by zero is not defined, and they discuss the implications of approaching the limit from different directions.

Fre4k
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



lim (1+ln x)/x = ?
x->0

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



lim 1/x + (ln x)/x
x->0
I know that (ln x)/x approaches -infinity faster than 1/x approaches infinity so the limit = -infinity, but how do I express this analytically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I got it. It's quite simple actually, duh.
 
Fre4k said:
Ok, I got it. It's quite simple actually, duh.
That's great to hear.

By the way, welcome to PF !
 
Yep, you just had to use L'Hopital's Rule and the answer is infinity.
 
SammyS said:
That's great to hear.

By the way, welcome to PF !

Thanks. :)
 
sharks said:
Yep, you just had to use L'Hopital's Rule and the answer is infinity.
That's not an indeterminate form. The Hospital rule doesn't apply.
 
Hi vela

Here is my understanding of the problem:
\lim_{n\to 0} \frac{1+\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0} \frac{1}{x}+\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}
\lim_{n\to 0} \frac{1}{x}=∞
\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{1}{x}=∞
The limit above is evaluated by using L'Hopital's Rule.
 
That's not an indeterminate form. The Hospital rule doesn't apply.
 
vela said:
That's not an indeterminate form. The Hospital rule doesn't apply.

Agreed, -∞/0 is not an indeterminate form. I kept assuming n approaches ∞ :redface:

To evaluate:
\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x
1/0=+∞
\ln 0=-∞
Hence, the product is -∞
 
Last edited:
  • #10
sharks said:
Agreed, -∞/0 is not an indeterminate form. I kept assuming n approaches ∞ :redface:

To evaluate:
\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x
1/0=+∞
\ln 0=-∞
Hence, the product is -∞
So, so wrong.
 
  • #11
sharks said:
Agreed, -∞/0 is not an indeterminate form. I kept assuming n approaches ∞ :redface:

To evaluate:
\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x
1/0=+∞
\ln 0=-∞
Hence, the product is -∞

You wrote for n -> 0, but I assume that was a typo :-p Division by 0 is not defined for real numbers, so cannot exactly call it equal to positive infinity. Only,

\lim_{x\to 0^{+}} \frac{1}{x} = +\infty

\lim_{x\to 0^{-}} \frac{1}{x} = -\infty

Which means that the original limit will not be two sided.
 
  • #12
Infinitum said:
You wrote for n -> 0, but I assume that was a typo :-p Division by 0 is not defined for real numbers, so cannot exactly call it equal to positive infinity. Only,

\lim_{x\to 0^{+}} \frac{1}{x} = +\infty

\lim_{x\to 0^{-}} \frac{1}{x} = -\infty

Which means that the original limit will not be two sided.

The original limit is only meaningful approaching from the positive side, since the natural logarithm isn't defined on the negative side. So from the point of view of this problem, it is safe to say that the limit of 1 / x is positive infinity (unless we want to agree that a limit is only meaningful if it is defined from both sides, in which case this thread is over).
 
  • #13
Hi Infinitum and Steely Dan

Thank you both for the clarification.
\lim_{n\to 0^+} \frac{1+\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0^+} \frac{1}{x}+\lim_{n\to 0^+}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x=(+\infty)+(+\infty.-\infty)=(+\infty)+(-\infty) which is undefined.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
sharks said:
Hi Infinitum and Steely Dan

Thank you both for the clarification.
\lim_{n\to 0^+} \frac{1+\ln x}{x}=\lim_{n\to 0^+} \frac{1}{x}+\lim_{n\to 0^+}\frac{1}{x}.\ln x=(+\infty)+(+\infty.-\infty)=(+\infty)+(-\infty) which is undefined.

This is not the way to go about it. If you know the properties of the natural logarithm, it's very clear that \text{ln}(x) + 1 \approx \text{ln}(x) if x is very small. So really this problem is just the limit of \text{ln}(x) / x (which is clearly -\infty).
 
  • #15
Steely Dan said:
This is not the way to go about it. If you know the properties of the natural logarithm, it's very clear that \text{ln}(x) + 1 \approx \text{ln}(x) if x is very small. So really this problem is just the limit of \text{ln}(x) / x (which is clearly -\infty).
I overlooked that part but it's clear that -∞+1≈-∞. Thanks again. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K