Limit of function of two variables

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the limit of a function of two variables as it approaches the point (0,0). The specific function is given as x^2/(x^2 + y^2), and the task is to determine whether the limit exists or not.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to evaluate the limit by substituting specific values for x and y, questioning whether this method is valid. They also inquire about the applicability of L'Hospital's Rule in this context.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's approach and suggest using polar coordinates as an alternative method to analyze the limit. Others indicate that the limit does not exist based on differing results from various paths taken towards (0,0). The discussion reflects multiple interpretations of the limit's behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of obtaining different limits along different paths and the limitations of proving the existence of a limit based solely on a finite number of paths.

merced
Messages
44
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Fnd the limit, if it exists, or show that the limit does not exist.
lim _{(x,y)--> (0,0)} [x^2/(x^2 + y^2)]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If x = 0, then f(0,y) = 0. f(x,y) --> 0 when (x,y) --> (0,0) along the y-axis.

If y = 0, then f(x,0) = 1. f(x,y) --> 1 when (,y) --> (0,0) along the x-axis.


1st, am I doing this right? By simply plugging in y = 0 or x = 0, I can determine the limit?

2nd, why am I not using L'Hospital's Rule. If (x,y) --> (0,0) then won't the function obviously go to 0/0 which is not real?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are doing it right. An easier way to see what is going on to make the respective polar subsititutions and take the limit as r->0
 
yes, you are correct. Indeed, the limit does not exist, since when taking different paths, the limits are different.
 
Just to clarify: if you take the limit along two different paths and get different answers then the limit itself does not exist. If you take limits along many different paths and always get the same answer, that does not prove the limit exists because you can't try all possible paths. If you suspect the limit does exist, then the best thing to do is what end3r7 suggested: change to polar coordinates so that the distance from (0,0) is determined by the single variable r. If the limit, as r goes to 0, does not depend on \theta the limit exists.
 
Thanks .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K