Limit of Sequences: Showing a_n > x^(1/2) & a_n -> x^(1/2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter crshbr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequences
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a sequence defined recursively, where the original poster seeks to demonstrate that the sequence remains above a certain threshold and converges to a specific limit. The context involves sequences and limits, particularly focusing on properties of bounded sequences and their convergence behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using mathematical induction to prove that the sequence remains above the square root of x. There are questions about the appropriate hypothesis for induction and the choice of epsilon in limit proofs. Some participants suggest direct approaches to inequalities without introducing new variables.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various insights and suggestions for proving the properties of the sequence. Some guidance has been offered regarding the induction step and the need to establish that the sequence is bounded and decreasing, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of proving the sequence's properties without referring to limits initially. There is also mention of confusion regarding the application of epsilon in limit proofs and the implications of the sequence's behavior based on its defined properties.

crshbr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

Homework Statement



Ok here is my problem concerning a sequence that is bounded and should have a limit.

[tex]\Large x\geq0[/tex] and [tex]\Large a_{0}>\sqrt{x}[/tex]

The sequence [tex]\Large a_{n}[/tex] is defined by [tex]\Large a_{n+1}=\frac{1}{2}(a_{n}+\frac{x}{a_{n}})[/tex] where [tex]\Large n\geq0[/tex]

So the first question is to show that [tex]\Large a_{n}>\sqrt{x}[/tex]
then it asks me show that the limit of [tex]\Large a_{n}=\sqrt{x}[/tex] as [tex]\Large n\rightarrow\infty[/tex]

The problem is that I can't seem to get anywhere with the first part without referring to limits. I was told to prove the first part using induction but I don't really know what hypothesis to make from which I could then continue.

As for the second part. I haven't really tried doing it yet, as I want to do the first part before moving on to it. However I can't seem to get the hang of this epsilon-N method. I understand what I am doing and why I am doing it, however I don't really understand how I should choose epsilon. Sometimes I am told to use epsilon=1/N or epsilon/2 or sometimes it's just left as epsilon>0 depending on the question. How would I be able to know instantly what epsilon to use when doing a proof.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are to prove by induction is: Given x ≥ 0, a0 ≥ [tex]\sqrt x[/tex], and

[tex]a_{n+1}= (\frac 1 2)(a_n+\frac x {a_n})[/tex]

prove an ≥ [tex]\sqrt x[/tex] for n = 1,2,...

So you need to start with the case n = 0, which is to prove a1 ≥ [tex]\sqrt x[/tex], or, using the formula for a1:

[tex](\frac 1 2)(a_0+\frac x {a_0}) \ge \sqrt x[/tex]

Do that and you will probably see how to do the induction step too.
 
Hi,

As a matter of fact I have already done that but I didn't get anything meaningful in my opinion. :(

Here is what I did:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}\left(a_{0}+\frac{x}{a_{0}}\right)\geq\sqrt{x}[/tex]

Let [tex]a_{0}=\sqrt{x}+y[/tex]

[tex]a_{1}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\left(\sqrt{x}+y\right)^{2}+x}{\sqrt{x}+y}\right)[/tex]

[tex]a_{1}=\frac{x+y(\sqrt{x}+y)}{\sqrt{x}+y}[/tex]

[tex]a_{1}=\frac{x}{a_{0}}+y[/tex]

So how does this really help me forward? This is the point I got stuck on.

Thanks for your help.
 
Man, that is confusing and I don't see what its point is. Try proving the inequality in the last line of my first post directly without introducing new variables. Maybe working backwards using reversible steps will help you.
 
Not a lot you can do there really though :S

All you end up with is:

[tex]a_{0}^{2}+x>2a_{0}\sqrt{x}[/tex]

which is not necessarily true...seeing as how the inequality only holds up to the point where

[tex]a_{0}^{2}>a_{0}\sqrt{x}[/tex]
 
Put it all on one side and don't cancel anything out. See if you recognize the form...
 
Hah, that's great!

And for part 2, would this be a correct proof for convergence:

Assuming [tex]\left\{a_{n}\right\}[/tex] is monotonic and decreasing

[tex]\forall\epsilon[/tex] [tex]\exists a_{N}\in\left\{a_{n}\right\}[/tex]

so that

[tex]L+\epsilon>a_{N}>L[/tex]

[tex]L+\epsilon>a_{N}>a_{n}>L[/tex]

[tex]L+\epsilon>a_{n}[/tex]

so [tex]\epsilon>|a_{n}-L|[/tex]

now as [tex]\epsilon>0[/tex] and [tex]L=\sqrt{x}[/tex]

[tex]|a_{n}-\sqrt{x}|<\epsilon[/tex]

[tex]|\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{x}|<\epsilon[/tex] so therefore the limit is correct
 
A decreasing and bounded below sequence would be convergent.

1. Have you proved the sequence is bounded below?
2. Have you proved the sequence is decreasing?

Your argument above makes about as much sense as your original inequality argument did, which is to say not much. You haven't shown L even exists, let alone that it is [tex]\sqrt x[/tex].

Once you have shown 1 and 2 you know the limit exists. You can figure out what the limit is by letting n --> oo in the recursion formula. At that point you can use limit theorems instead of epsilon arguments.
 
Also I forgot to ask you, did you do the induction step after you did the n=1 step?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K