Limit of x/(sqrt(1+3x)-1) as x approaches 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter KiwiKid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the expression x/(sqrt(1+3x)-1) as x approaches 0 can be evaluated using algebraic manipulation. The key step involves multiplying the expression by (sqrt(1+3x)+1)/(sqrt(1+3x)+1) to eliminate the indeterminate form. After simplification, the limit resolves to 1/3, as the x terms cancel out and the remaining expression approaches 1/3 as x approaches 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limit laws in calculus
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Knowledge of square root functions and their properties
  • Basic skills in simplifying rational expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of L'Hôpital's Rule for indeterminate forms
  • Learn about Taylor series expansions for approximating limits
  • Explore the concept of continuity and its relation to limits
  • Practice solving limits involving square roots and rational functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to improve their skills in evaluating limits and simplifying expressions in calculus.

KiwiKid
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the limit of x/(sqrt(1+3x)-1) as x approaches 0.

Homework Equations


The limit laws.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm really stuck. I've tried multiplying all of it by (sqrt(1+3x)+1)/(sqrt(1+3x)+1), but that didn't work. I can't seem to get that 0 out of the denominator. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you get after doing that multiplication?
 
micromass said:
What did you get after doing that multiplication?

(x(sqrt(1+3x)+1))/3x. Or (x*sqrt(1+3x)+x)/3x if you will. But the 3x still goes to 0, so that doesn't seem to work.
 
KiwiKid said:
(x(sqrt(1+3x)+1))/3x. Or (x*sqrt(1+3x)+x)/3x if you will. But the 3x still goes to 0, so that doesn't seem to work.

You can simplify it: you have x is numerator and denominator.
 
micromass said:
You can simplify it: you have x is numerator and denominator.

Oh, wait! I realize what I did wrong. I'd seen that, yes, but made the stupid mistake of presuming that there would still be '2x' (instead of '3') left in the denominator. *slaps head* Thank you, micro. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K