Limit Points of Rational Numbers in the Real Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the set P defined by the ratios of sums of integers, specifically P = {X_m / X_n} where X_m and X_n are the sums of the first m and n integers, respectively. Participants are exploring the limit points of this set within the context of rational and real numbers, particularly focusing on the interval (0,1).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering whether the set can generate all rationals or reals in the interval (0,1) and discussing the implications of m and n approaching infinity. There are suggestions to manipulate the expression m(m+1)/n(n+1) to better understand the generated numbers. Some participants are questioning the nature of limit points and the density of rationals in the reals.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various approaches being explored, including algebraic manipulation and limit arguments. Participants are questioning assumptions about the completeness of the set in generating all rationals or reals and are considering specific examples to illustrate their points. There is no explicit consensus yet, but hints and guidance have been provided to facilitate further exploration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, including the definitions of limit points and the properties of rational numbers. There is an ongoing examination of whether the set can approximate all reals between 0 and 1 and the implications of integer properties on the limit points.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


If we have the set [itex]P= \{ \frac{X_m}{X_n} \}[/itex]
where [itex]X_m=1+2+3+4...+m[/itex]
and [itex]X_n=1+2+3+...+n[/itex] and m<n determine all the limit points for this set.
m and n are positive integers

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems to me that we might be able to construct all the rationals between 0 and 1
with this set. So i would think this set will be dense on (0,1)
And since we can't generate every integer with just [itex]X_m[/itex] alone
[itex]X_m[/itex] and [itex]X_n[/itex] need to share common factors for this to happen. Or maybe we don't need to show that we can construct every rational on that interval but just show that we can get arbitrarily close to every rational on that interval.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi cragar! :smile:

hmm … is it all the rationals, or all the reals, or … ?

anyway, it'll be lot easier to solve if you write each one as m(m+1)/n(n+1) :wink:
 
I don't think it would be all the reals, well maybe it could if we let m and n go to infinity.
so if we write it as that formula that you said. should I try to algebraically manipulate
it and get to where I could see what kind of numbers it would generate. Or do some limit argument to say that we could construct all the reals between 0 and 1.
 
cragar said:
I don't think it would be all the reals, well maybe it could if we let m and n go to infinity.
so if we write it as that formula that you said. should I try to algebraically manipulate
it and get to where I could see what kind of numbers it would generate. Or do some limit argument to say that we could construct all the reals between 0 and 1.

Well, try it. Here's a hint to make it easier. First show numbers of the form m^2/n^2 are limit points of P. Now can you show, for example, that 1/2 is a limit point of numbers of the form m^2/n^2?
 
cragar said:
should I try to algebraically manipulate it and get to where I could see what kind of numbers it would generate. Or do some limit argument to say that we could construct all the reals between 0 and 1.

first, make sure that it really does do all the rationals

then see whether that automatically means it does all the reals (because the rationals are dense)
 
I guess i couldn't get 1/2 as a limit point with [itex]\frac{m^2}{n^2}[/itex]
becuase no integer squared is 2 .
 
cragar said:
I guess i couldn't get 1/2 as a limit point with [itex]\frac{m^2}{n^2}[/itex]
becuase no integer squared is 2 .

It says "limit point" it doesn't say "equals". You can approximate sqrt(2) with rationals, can't you?
 
ok yes, so I need to show that between any 2 reals that there exists
[itex]a< \frac{m^2}{n^2} < b[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K