Limits of Functions .... B&S Theorem 4.2.9 .... ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on understanding Theorem 4.2.9 from "Introduction to Real Analysis" by Bartle and Sherbert, specifically the proof involving limits. The theorem states that if \( x \in A \cap V_{\delta}(c) \) and \( x \neq c \), then \( f(x) > \frac{1}{2} L > 0 \). Peter clarifies that \( V_{\delta}(c) \) represents the open interval \( (c - \delta, c + \delta) \) and explains that the condition \( |f(x) - L| < \frac{1}{2}L \) leads to the conclusion that \( f(x) \) must be greater than \( \frac{1}{2}L \). This logical progression confirms the validity of the theorem's assertion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in real analysis
  • Familiarity with the concept of open intervals
  • Knowledge of the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Explore other theorems related to limits in real analysis
  • Review examples of proofs involving limits and continuity
  • Learn about the implications of the B&S Theorem in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of limits and theorems in mathematical proofs.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Introduction to Real Analysis" (Fourth Edition) b Robert G Bartle and Donald R Sherbert ...

I am focused on Chapter 4: Limits ...

I need help in fully understanding an aspect of the proof of Theorem 4.2.9 ...Theorem 4.2.9 ... ... reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7257In the above text from Bartle and Sherbert we read the following:"... ... Therefore (why?) it follows that if $$x \in A \cap V_{ \delta } (c), x \neq c$$, then $$f(x) \gt \frac{1}{2} L \gt 0$$. ... ... Can someone please explain why/how it is true that if $$x \in A \cap V_{ \delta } (c), x \neq c$$, then $$f(x) \gt \frac{1}{2} L \gt 0$$?
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it $V_\delta(c)$ is the open interval $(c - \delta, c + \delta)$. In that case, if $x\in A\cap V_\delta(c)$ and $x\neq c$, then $x\in A$ and $0 < |x - c| < \delta$. Thus $|f(x) - L| < (1/2)L$, or $-(1/2)L < f(x) - L < (1/2)L$. In particular, $f(x) - L > -(1/2)L$, so $f(x) > L - (1/2)L = (1/2)L > 0$, as desired.
 
Euge said:
I take it $V_\delta(c)$ is the open interval $(c - \delta, c + \delta)$. In that case, if $x\in A\cap V_\delta(c)$ and $x\neq c$, then $x\in A$ and $0 < |x - c| < \delta$. Thus $|f(x) - L| < (1/2)L$, or $-(1/2)L < f(x) - L < (1/2)L$. In particular, $f(x) - L > -(1/2)L$, so $f(x) > L - (1/2)L = (1/2)L > 0$, as desired.
Thanks Euge ...

Appreciate your help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K