Limits on an Integral of a semi-circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZedCar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Limits
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the integral over the region defined by the inequalities x² + y² ≤ 4 and 0 ≤ y ≤ 2, representing the upper half of a circle with a radius of 2 centered at the origin. The limits for x are correctly set from -2 to 2, while the limits for y are derived as 0 to √(4 - x²) to ensure that each point in the semicircle is covered exactly once during integration. The alternative suggestion of using y limits from 0 to 2 is incorrect as it would encompass points outside the semicircle. The discussion also touches on the validity of switching the order of integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinates and geometric regions
  • Knowledge of the properties of circles and semicircles
  • Ability to manipulate inequalities and functions for integration limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of double integrals in polar coordinates
  • Learn about changing the order of integration in double integrals
  • Explore exercises on integrating over circular regions
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of integration limits
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques and geometric interpretations of integrals. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of integrating over circular regions.

ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A question asks to calculate the integral over the region R given by:

x^2 + y^2 <= 4
0 <= y <= 2

Which would be the upper half of a circle of radius 2 centred on the origin.

The integral is done in the book I have and the limits of x are given as -2 to 2, which I can understand.

Though the limits for y are given as: 0 to (4 - x^2)^0.5

I can see that they have obtained this limit from rearranging the first part of the region R.

BUT, why is the limit for y not 0 to 2. Or alternatively, if what they have done is correct, why is it not equally valid to state the limits for x are: 0 to (4 - y^2)^0.5



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
When integrating over a region, we need to hit each point in the region exactly once, and no other points.

So your recipe is, for each x between -2 and 2, (hold x fixed and) integrate over y=0 to 2. But then you would hit all points in a rectangle, not the semicircle.

You'll hit each point in the semicircle once if, for each x between -2 and 2, you go from y= 0 to the upper circle.

If this seemed to make sense, here's some exercises to check that you understand.

Try switching order of integration, that is, for each y in between (which values?), let x runf from where to where, thus hitting each point in the region.

Another exercise. In the original limits, hold x fixed and let y vary, why do we take x goes from -2 to 2. Why not a smaller or larger region, what exactly would be wrong with that, how geometrically or by what type of value would it change the answer. (Hint: integration works if we hit each point in region exactly once, and no others.)
 
Hi ZedCar! :smile:
ZedCar said:
The integral is done in the book I have and the limits of x are given as -2 to 2, which I can understand.

Though the limits for y are given as: 0 to (4 - x^2)^0.5

why is it not equally valid to state the limits for x are: 0 to (4 - y^2)^0.5

It is, if the y limits are -2 to 2. :smile:

You can have vertical slices of thickness dx and height √(4 - x2)

or horizontal slices of thickness dy and width √(4 - y2). :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K