Limits splitting the fraction into two

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the expression lim (x2n-1)/(x2n+1) as n approaches infinity is dependent on the value of x. For x > 1, the limit equals 1; for x = 1, the limit equals 0; and for 0 < x < 1, the limit equals -1. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering different cases based on the value of x, particularly for negative values where the limit does not exist (DNE). The participants agree that interpreting n as an integer simplifies the analysis of the limit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with polynomial expressions
  • Knowledge of case analysis in mathematical proofs
  • Basic concepts of real numbers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the behavior of limits involving polynomial fractions
  • Learn about case analysis techniques in calculus
  • Explore the implications of integer versus non-integer powers in limits
  • Investigate the concept of limits that do not exist (DNE) in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of limits in polynomial expressions.

StephenPrivitera
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
limn-->oo(x2n-1)/(x2n+1)
I can't figure this one out. I've tried everything. I tried splitting the fraction into two, applying a log to each side, factoring the top, dividing by x2n, and Lhopitals rule doesn't apply and wouldn't help if it did. Any ideas?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
perhaps the only way to do this would be to consider various cases such as x>1, x=1, x<-1, x=-1, etc.
anyone agree?

I get for x>1
lim=1
for x=1, lim=0
if 0<x<1, lim=-1

What about x<0? What is -2^999999.5? Surely, it's not real. Can we say that lim DNE for x<0?
For -1<x<0 x^n would be very small, but wouldn't n have to be some integer?
 
Last edited:
I got stuck.

For example,
I'll omit the subscripts.

lim(x2n-1)/(x2n+1)=lim(1-1/x2n)/(1+1/x2n)
As n grows to infinity, we can say nothing about the limit, because it depends on what x is. If x is small then 1/x is large. If x is big, then 1/x is small.


edit: whoops edited wrong post, sorry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Grargh, you read and responded before I could delete my post.

Yes, breaking it up into cases is a good idea.

edit: n often implicitly means an integer, and it wouldn't surprise me if this problem assumed as such.

*sigh* Today isn't my best day. :wink:
 
Last edited:
I would interpret this as n being an integer so you don't have any problems with fractional powers of negative numbers.

Because x2n= (x2)n) it doesn't matter whether x is positive or negative so you might as well assume positive. In that case the crucial cases are: 0<= x<1, x= 1, x> 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K