Line integral and continuous gradient

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a line integral of the gradient of a function over a specified parametric curve. The function is represented by a table of values, and the curve is defined by the parametric equations x = t² + 1 and y = t³ + t for the interval 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to utilize the table of function values in relation to the line integral. They express uncertainty about constructing a function from the table and question the requirements of the problem. Some participants suggest considering the fundamental theorem of gradients and evaluating the function at the endpoints of the curve.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, with some guidance provided regarding the use of the fundamental theorem of gradients. There is a discussion about evaluating the function at the endpoints based on the table values, but no consensus on the correctness of the approach has been reached.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of clarity regarding the use of the table and the expectations of the problem. There is also a reference to the need for a continuous gradient and the concept of exact differentials in the context of the integral.

nlsherrill
Messages
320
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A table of values of a function f with continuous gradient is given. Find the line integral over C of "gradient F dr" where C has parametric equations x = t2 + 1, y = t3 + t, 0<=t<= 1.


Sorry, don't know latex.

But here's a picture of the table and values
photo.jpg


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not even sure what the problem wants me to do with the table. I "assume" since the problem says the table represents values of a function, that I should look at the table and construct a function from it. Well I have tried a few different ways and none of them can stay consistent for more than a line. I feel like this problem is easier than it seems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT: What does the fundamental theorem of gradients tell you?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
HINT: What does the fundamental theorem of gradients tell you?

So basically with that definition and the table provided, they were looking for you to just evaluate the function at its endpoints correct? I got the right answer, which is 6, but I don't know if what I did was the right way to do it. The parameter t ranges from 0 to 1, so I just plugged in 0 to the x and y components to get (1,0), which on the table=4. Then plugging in 1 for t in the components I got (2,2), which on the table =10. Subtracting the endpoint from the starting point gave me 6. Is this the correct way to do it?

And thank you for your help so far.
 
Yes, the as long as f(x,y)dx+ g(x,yy)dy is an "exact differential", that is, there exist F(x,y) such that dF= f(x)dx+ g(y)dy, then
\int_{t_0}^{t_1} f(x)dx+ g(y)dy= F(x(t_1),y(t_1))- F(x(t_0), y(t_0))

Here, you are given that the F whose values are tabulated gives the required gradient. Since the path is apparently given by x = t^2 + 1, y = t^3 + t, 0\le t\le 1, the endpoints are at (1, 0) and (2, 2).

Your integral is just F(2, 2)- F(1, 0) both of which can be read off the table.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K