Line Integral of circle in counterclockwise direction

songoku
Messages
2,467
Reaction score
382
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Line Integral
Parametric
1701323428594.png


My attempt:
Let ##x=a \cos \theta## and ##y=a \sin \theta##

$$\int_{L} xy^2 dx-x^2ydy$$
$$=\int_{0}^{2\pi} \left( (a\cos \theta)(a\sin \theta)^2 (-a\sin \theta)-(a\cos \theta)^2 (a \sin \theta)(a\cos \theta)\right) d\theta$$
$$=-a^4 \int_{0}^{2\pi}\left( \sin^3 \theta \cos \theta+\cos^3 \theta \sin \theta \right) d\theta$$

I get zero as the result of the integration. Is it possible? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the integral is zero by symmetry.
 
Orodruin said:
Yes, the integral is zero by symmetry.
To qualify this:

Take the first term and consider the integral along the lower half-circle. You obtain ##y^2 = a^2 - x^2## and can parametrize it by ##-a < x < a##. The integral along the lower half-circle is therefore
$$
\int_{-a}^a y^2 x \, dx = \int_{-a}^a (a^2 - x^2) x \, dx
$$
which is an integral of an odd function over an even interval and therefore zero. A similar argument applies to the upper half-circle and for the integral of the other term.

Alternatively, you can use Green's formula and conclude that
$$
\oint_\Gamma \left(y^2 x \, dx - x^2 y \, dy\right)
= \int_{S} \left(-\frac{\partial(x^2 y)}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial(y^2 x)}{\partial y}\right) dx\, dy
= - 4 \int_{S} xy \, dx\, dy,
$$
where ##S## is the disc enclosed by the circle. This integral is obviously zero since the integrand is odd in both ##x## and ##y## whereas ##S## is symmetric with respect to ##x \to -x## as well as ##y \to -y##.
 
Thank you very much for the help and explanation Orodruin
 
FYI, there is a very large class of functions that will give zero integrals on closed curves. They are related to potentials and to analytic functions with no enclosed singularities.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD and songoku
FactChecker said:
FYI, there is a very large class of functions that will give zero integrals on closed curves. They are related to potentials and to analytic functions with no enclosed singularities.
Should be pointed out that this is not the case here though. The zero really comes from symmetry. This may be seen from the fact that the integrand of the area integral in Green’s formula above is not zero so there will exist areas such that the integral around them are non-zero.

(Yes, I tried that first before arguing symmetry 😉)
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and FactChecker
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top