Linear Air Resistance with a proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the velocity of an object dropped from rest, as described by equation 2.33, aligns with the elementary result for free fall in a vacuum when air resistance is negligible. The context involves concepts of linear air resistance and the Taylor series expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss substituting values into the equation and using the Taylor series to simplify the exponential term. There is uncertainty about how to proceed after the initial substitution and whether the approximation is valid for small time values.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the Taylor series expansion and have clarified the nature of the approximation involved. There is an ongoing exploration of the steps needed to simplify the expression, with some participants expressing confusion while others appear to gain clarity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that air resistance is negligible for small values of velocity and time, and there is a hint provided regarding the Taylor series to aid in the proof.

aaj92
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Equation 2.33 gives the velocity of an object dropped from rest. At first, why v[itex]_{y}[/itex] is small, air resistance should be unimportant and 2.33 should agree with the elementary result V[itex]_{y}[/itex] = gt for free fall in a vacuum. Prove that this is the case. [HINT: remember the Taylor series].

Homework Equations



equation 2.33---> v[itex]_{y}[/itex](t) = v[itex]_{ter}[/itex](1-e[itex]^{-t/\tau}[/itex])

v[itex]_{ter}[/itex]=mg/b = g[itex]\tau[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I substituted g\[itex]\tau[/itex] for v[itex]_{ter}[/itex] uhhhh and yeah... not sure what to do? I know it's probably really simple but I'm stuck
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaj92 said:

Homework Statement



Equation 2.33 gives the velocity of an object dropped from rest. At first, why v[itex]_{y}[/itex] is small, air resistance should be unimportant and 2.33 should agree with the elementary result V[itex]_{y}[/itex] = gt for free fall in a vacuum. Prove that this is the case. [HINT: remember the Taylor series].


Homework Equations



equation 2.33---> v[itex]_{y}[/itex](t) = v[itex]_{ter}[/itex](1-e[itex]^{-t/\tau}[/itex])

v[itex]_{ter}[/itex]=mg/b = g[itex]\tau[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I substituted g\[itex]\tau[/itex] for v[itex]_{ter}[/itex] uhhhh and yeah... not sure what to do? I know it's probably really simple but I'm stuck

Do you know the Taylor series for ex? Just put x = -t/τ and expand the exponential term to the first few terms. Terms with the power of t greater than one (i.e. t2 and higher) can be disregarded because we're talking about a small time t (after release) here.

Once you do the simple algebra, you'll get the expression you need.
 
yeah the taylor series is e^x = 1 + x

so I just make it e^(-t/tau) = 1 - (t/tau) ? then do i substitute for tau? sorry I'm just not seeing v = gt :/

wait so then you plug in 1- (t/tau) into the original equation and then solve it right? haha sorry. I think i figured it out. thank you :)
 
aaj92 said:
yeah the taylor series is e^x = 1 + x

so I just make it e^(-t/tau) = 1 - (t/tau) ? then do i substitute for tau? sorry I'm just not seeing v = gt :/

wait so then you plug in 1- (t/tau) into the original equation and then solve it right? haha sorry. I think i figured it out. thank you :)

Just a couple of things: [itex]e^x = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} + ...[/itex] (an infinite series).

[itex]e^x \approx 1 + x[/itex] is an approximation that's only valid for small x. So you can use it here. However, it's wrong to simply state [itex]e^x = 1 + x[/itex] like you did. Remember that this is only an approximation where you're ignoring all those higher powers of x (because they're too tiny).

Also, you're not solving an equation, just simplifying an expression. But yes, put (1-t/τ) into that expression in place of [itex]e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}[/itex], put [itex]v_{ter}[/itex] as gτ, and you'll quickly get the result. :smile:
 
haha yeah it was way easier than I was trying to make it :p thank you so much! :)
 
No worries! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K