Linear Algebra - Characteristic Polynomials and Nilpotent Operators

Click For Summary
If the characteristic polynomial of an operator T is (-1)^n*t^n, then T is nilpotent, as indicated by the matrix form having zeros on the diagonal. The Cayley-Hamilton theorem confirms that p(T) = 0, establishing nilpotency since T raised to a power equals zero for some integer p. The discussion highlights the assumption that the vector space is finite-dimensional, as the theorem does not apply to infinite-dimensional spaces. Participants express uncertainty about defining characteristic polynomials in infinite dimensions. Overall, the conclusion is that the nilpotency of T is valid under the assumption of finite-dimensionality.
glacier302
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the characteristic polynomial of an operator T is (-1)^n*t^n, is T nilpotent?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My first instinct for this question is that the answer is yes, because the matrix form of T must have 0's on the diagonal and must be either upper triangular or lower triangular. This is what I found when I tried to find 2x2 and 3x3 matrices with characteristic polynomial (-1)^n*t^n. However, I'm not sure how to actually prove this fact (especially for the nxn case), or how to show that T is nilpotent using this fact.

Any help would be much appreciated : )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If p(t) is the characteristic polynomial of a matrix T, then p(T)=0, yes? Now what does 'nilpotent' mean?
 
Nilpotent means that T^p = 0 for some positive integer p.
 
Oh wow. I just realized how easy this question is...I just didn't remember the Cayley-Hamilton theorem. Thank you so much!
 
One question: Doesn't the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem only apply to linear operators on finite-dimensional vector spaces? What if the vector space is infinite-dimensional?
 
glacier302 said:
One question: Doesn't the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem only apply to linear operators on finite-dimensional vector spaces? What if the vector space is infinite-dimensional?

Likely doesn't apply to infinite dimensional vector spaces. I'm not sure 'characteristic polynomial' applies to infinite dimensional vector spaces either. How would you define it?
 
That's a good point. So I'm pretty sure that although it's not stated that the vector space is finite-dimensional, we're supposed to assume it. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K