Linear Algebra Determinant proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the determinant of a specific matrix form, particularly an upper triangular matrix, is equal to the product of its leading diagonal elements. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the generalization of this property to other types of matrices, such as lower triangular or general matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the type of matrix for which the determinant property should be generalized, seeking clarification on whether it applies to upper triangular, lower triangular, or general matrices. Other participants mention the established property of determinants for triangular matrices and suggest familiarity with the Laplace expansion.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the definitions and properties of determinants in relation to triangular matrices. Some guidance has been offered regarding the determinant of triangular matrices, while the original poster seeks further clarification on the definitions and formalities needed for their proof.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of familiarity with certain concepts, such as the Laplace expansion, and is encouraged to define the determinant and relevant theorems in their proof. There is an emphasis on the need for formal presentation in mathematical proofs.

TanWu
Messages
17
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
(a) Show that a matrix ##\left(\begin{array}{ll}e & g \\ 0 & f\end{array}\right)## has determinant equal to the product of the elements on the leading diagonal. Can you generalise this idea to any ##n \times n## matrix?
Relevant Equations
##\left(\begin{array}{ll}e & g \\ 0 & f\end{array}\right)##
I have a doubt about this problem.

(a) Show that a matrix ##\left(\begin{array}{ll}e & g \\ 0 & f\end{array}\right)## has determinant equal to the product of the elements on the leading diagonal. Can you generalize this idea to any ##n \times n## matrix? The first part is simple, it is just ef.

I have a doubt about what ##n \times n## matrix they want generalized too, for example do they want a upper triangular ##n \times n## matrix like the one the author as written or a lower triangular, or general matrix, etc.

I express gratitude to those who help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and nuuskur
Physics news on Phys.org
The determinant of an upper or lower triangular matrix is equal to the product of the elements on the leading diagonal.

An upper triangular matrix is a square matrix whose entries below the leading diagonal are zero.

The claim follows quickly provided you are familiar with the Laplace expansion of the determinant.

Also, good job on using much more helpful titles. :cool:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and TanWu
Thank you Sir. Apologize, I am not familiar with that.
 
In the "Relevant Equations" section, you should state how you have defined the determinant or any already-proven fact(s) that you use in your proof.
In general, you should work on stating your proofs in a more formal way. Where they are used, your proof should state what definitions, theorems, or lemas you are using.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TanWu
note that geometrically this is the fact that the area of a parallelogram equals that of the rectangle with same height and base.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TanWu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
904
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K