Linear Algebra - Direct Sums [SOLVED]

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the proof of the direct sum of subspaces in linear algebra, specifically stating that if W1 and W2 are subspaces of a vector space V with W1 = K1 ⊕ K2 ⊕ ... ⊕ Kp and W2 = M1 ⊕ M2 ⊕ ... ⊕ Mq, and their intersection W1 ∩ W2 = {0}, then W1 + W2 = W1 ⊕ W2 = K1 ⊕ K2 ⊕ ... ⊕ Kp ⊕ M1 ⊕ M2 ⊕ ... ⊕ Mq. The participants confirm that the definition of direct sum allows for this conclusion, emphasizing that the unique representation of elements in W1 + W2 justifies the notation W1 + W2 = W1 ⊕ W2. They also clarify that while W1 + W2 is not equal to W1 ⊕ W2 in general, it is isomorphic to it when the intersection is trivial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces
  • Knowledge of direct sums in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with the notation and properties of linear combinations
  • Basic concepts of intersection and union of sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of direct sums in vector spaces
  • Learn about the implications of trivial intersections in linear algebra
  • Explore the concept of isomorphism in vector spaces
  • Review examples of direct sums with specific subspaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, educators teaching vector space concepts, and mathematicians interested in the properties of direct sums and subspace interactions.

pezola
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Linear Algebra - Direct Sums

Homework Statement




Let W1, W2, K1, K2,..., Kp, M1, M2,..., Mq be subspaces of a vector space V such that
W1 = K1 \oplusK2\oplus ... \oplusKp
and
W2 = M1 \oplusM2 \oplus...\oplusMq

Prove that if W1 \capW2 = {0}, then W1 + W2 = W1 \oplusW2 = K1 \oplusK2\oplus...\oplus Kp \oplus M1 \oplusM2 \oplus...\oplusMq

The Attempt at a Solution



Can we not just say W1 + W2 = W1 \oplusW2 since their intersection is empty?

Then, by the definition of direct sum, the subspaces inside W1 and W2 cannot intersect each other.

Then can we say
W1 \oplusW2 = K1 \oplusK2\oplus...\oplus Kp \oplus M1 \oplusM2 \oplus...\oplusMq ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess the relevance of the question would depend on the definition of direct sum you've seen, but I agree that it is quite trivial. If the intersection of W1 and W2 is trivial, then every element in W1+W2 can be written uniquely as a sum of the form w1+w2 (wi in Wi), and thus the notation W_1+W_2 =W_1 \oplus W_2 is justified.

And the last part is just a statement about the associativity of \oplus.
 
For the record... in the case where W_1 \cap W_2 \cong \{ 0 \},

W_1 + W_2 \neq W_1 \oplus W_2

W_1 + W_2 \cong W_1 \oplus W_2


Also for the record, if W_1 \cap W_2 = \{ 0 \}, then their intersection is nonempty. (It contains the element 0)
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K