Proof involving vector subspaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the union of two subspaces W1 and W2 of a vector space V is a subspace if and only if one subspace is contained within the other (W1 ⊆ W2 or W2 ⊆ W1). Participants explore methods to demonstrate this relationship, including indirect proof techniques. A specific example involving the x-axis and y-axis is suggested to illustrate the concept. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector addition within the context of subspaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces
  • Familiarity with vector addition and scalar multiplication
  • Knowledge of set theory, particularly unions and subsets
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, including proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces and subspaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about indirect proof methods in mathematical reasoning
  • Explore examples of vector subspaces in R² and R³
  • Investigate the implications of the union of sets in linear algebra contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students in linear algebra, educators teaching vector space concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of vector subspaces and their unions.

strman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let W1 and W2 be subspaces of a vector space V. Prove that W1\bigcupW2 is a subspace of V if and only if W1\subseteqW2 or W2\subseteqW1Well so far, I have proven half of the statement (starting with the latter conditions). Right now I'm struggling to show that the final conditions follow from W1\bigcupW2. I have an idea for the method: assume that W1\subseteqW2 is not true, and then prove that W2\subseteqW1 must follow.

This is my first linear algebra class, and this is from the first problem set due, so I know that nothing that complex is going on here. However, I've been looking at this problem for the past 30 minutes or so, and I'm hoping that someone could push me in the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how about directly doing it? needs a bit of flesh...

W1 U W2 is subspace
take w1 in W1, w2 in W2
w1+w2 is in W1 U W2
but this means w1+w2 is in either W1 or W2
hence either w1 is in W2 or w2 is in W1

The problem with the way you describe might be if W1⊆W2 is not true, then this excludes W1=W2, which means you can only prove a proper subset, but i need to think about it more
 
I would use an "indirect proof". suppose it is NOT true that either W1 is a subset of W2 or W2 is a subset of W1. Then there exist a vector w1 that is not in W2 and a vector w2 that is not in W1. If w1+ w2= v is in W1 union W2, it is in either W1 or W2. But w1= v- w2, etc.

It might help to look at a simple example. Suppose W1 is the x-axis (as a subspace of the plane) and W2 is the y- axis. Are there sums of things in W1 and W2 that are not in their union? Generalize that idea.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K