Linear Algebra problem (linear equations)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conditions for the augmented matrix \(\left(\begin{array}{ccc}a&1&-1\\2&1&b\end{array}\right)\) to yield no solution, infinitely many solutions, or a unique solution. The row-reduced form \(\left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&0&\frac{b+1}{2-a}\\0&1&\frac{-2-a}{2-a}\end{array}\right)\) reveals that for no solution, \(a = 2\) and \(b \neq -1\) are necessary conditions. A unique solution occurs when \(a \neq 2\) and \(b\) is defined accordingly, while infinitely many solutions arise when both numerators equal zero, specifically when \(a = 2\) and \(b = -1\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of augmented matrices in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of row reduction techniques
  • Familiarity with the concepts of unique, infinite, and no solutions in linear equations
  • Ability to interpret conditions on variables in mathematical contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of row reduction on the solutions of linear equations
  • Learn about the conditions for unique and infinite solutions in linear systems
  • Explore the concept of dependent and independent equations in linear algebra
  • Investigate the role of parameters in defining solution sets for linear systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, educators teaching systems of equations, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of solution conditions in linear systems.

kirab
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given augmented matrix

[tex]\left(\begin{array}{ccc}a&1&-1\\2&1&b\end{array}\right)[/tex]

list conditions on a and b such that there is:

i) no solution
ii) infinitely many solutions and
iii) a unique solution

The Attempt at a Solution



I row-reduced the matrix to

[tex]\left(\begin{array}{ccc}1&0&\frac{b+1}{2-a}\\0&1&\frac{-2-a}{2-a}\end{array}\right)[/tex]

and ended up with

i) for no solution, a = 0, 2 (since on the steps to row reducing, there was a [tex]\frac{1}{a}[/tex] in one of the entries). My textbook, however, says that a = 2, b != -1 are the conditions for no solution. Why b != -1 and why not a = 0?

Now I didn't get a result for unique solution and infinitely many solutions separately.

I only got that [tex]x1 = \frac{b+1}{2-a}[/tex] and [tex]x2 = \frac{-2 - ab}{2-a}[/tex]
which is the correct unique solution except that the book places restrictions on a and b, namely that they must be a = 2, b = -1. Where are these restrictions coming from and wouldn't a = 2 make it have no solution? Also how would one get an infinite amount of solutions in this case? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the result for x1 and x2. If a=2 there is no solution if either numerator doesn't vanish. But if they both have the form 0/0 then you have an infinite number of solutions. To verify this in a clearer way just put a=2 and b=-1 into the original equation. Then the first row and second rows of the matrix are the same, so you really only have one equation in two unknowns.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K