Linear algebra question about matrices

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the values of k for which the given augmented matrix results in either infinitely many solutions or no solutions. The matrix in question is: [ (k + 2) -2 1 | 2 ], [ (k + 3) (k + 3) 2 | 2 ], [ (k + 2) -2 (k - 1) | -3 ]. To find k for infinitely many solutions, the determinant must equal zero, and both f(k) and g(k) must also equal zero. Conversely, for no solutions, f(k) must equal zero while g(k) remains non-zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of augmented matrices and their role in linear systems
  • Knowledge of row reduction techniques, specifically row echelon form
  • Familiarity with determinants and their implications in linear algebra
  • Ability to interpret the conditions for unique, infinite, and no solutions in linear systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to perform row reduction to echelon form on matrices
  • Study the properties of determinants and their role in linear equations
  • Explore the implications of the rank of a matrix on the solution set of linear systems
  • Investigate the relationship between the coefficients of a matrix and the solutions of the corresponding system
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians solving systems of equations, and anyone interested in understanding the conditions for solutions in matrix equations.

LaraCroft
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
How would one determine the values of k such that the following matrix is the augmented matrix of a system with infinitely many solutions:

[ (k + 2) -2 1 | 2 ]
[ (k + 3) (k+ 3) 2 | 2 ]
[ (k + 2) -2 (k -1 ) | -3 ]

Also, how would I get all values of k such that the matrix for the same to be an augmented matrix of a system with no solutions?

It confuses me on how to find all possible values of k!

Thank you!:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LaraCroft said:
How would one determine the values of k such that the following matrix is the augmented matrix of a system with infinitely many solutions:

[ (k + 2) -2 1 | 2 ]
[ (k + 3) (k+ 3) 2 | 2 ]
[ (k + 2) -2 (k -1 ) | -3 ]

Also, how would I get all values of k such that the matrix for the same to be an augmented matrix of a system with no solutions?

It confuses me on how to find all possible values of k!

Thank you!:smile:
Try to row reduce it!
Reducing it to upper triangular form, so that you have only 0s below the main diagonal, you wind up with 0 0 f(k) | g(k). There is not a unique solution if f(k)= 0. There are an infinite number of solutions if g(k)= 0 also. (If f(k)= 0 and g(k) is not 0, then there is no solution.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would have set the determinant equal to zero. Of course the determinate can be calculated via row reduction.
 
The problem with that is that if the determinant is 0, then the matrix equation may have infinitely many solutions or NO solution.
the question here was specifically to determine k so the equation has infinitely many solutions. You need to include the right hand side to determine that.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The problem with that is that if the determinant is 0, then the matrix equation may have infinitely many solutions or NO solution.
the question here was specifically to determine k so the equation has infinitely many solutions. You need to include the right hand side to determine that.

You can always substitute the roots obtained by the determinate back into the original system and then do row reduction. You can also put the system into upper triangular form while computing the determinate.
 
Ok...

Firstly, thank you everyone for responding...

Secondly, I am still not getting how to determine all the values of K, so that the matrix (call it A) is the augmented matrix of a system with infinitely many solutions. How would I find all values of K?

I understand that I need to row echelon it...but I think the way I am doing it is wrong...since the first entry cannot be 1...I start by doing Row 2 minus Row 1...and I I continue...however I am confused on what to do next in order to find k!

Apparently I should also be able to determine all values of k so that the matrix has a system with no solutions...

Thanks again:smile:
 
LaraCroft said:
Ok...
I understand that I need to row echelon it...but I think the way I am doing it is wrong...since the first entry cannot be 1...I start by doing Row 2 minus Row 1...and I I continue...however I am confused on what to do next in order to find k!

Before you do your subtraction multiply rows one and three by (K+3) and row 2 by (k+1)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K